000			04234nam a22006015i 4500
001			200044
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214233148.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			210830t20132013nju fo d z eng d
010			_a2013010364
020			_a9780813562223 _qprint
020			_a9780813562230 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.36019/9780813562230 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780813562230
035			_a(DE-B1597)526236
035			_a(OCoLC)1121056737
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050	0	0	_aHQ1034.U5 _bK56 2014
050		4	_aHQ1034.U5 _bK56 2014eb
072		7	_aSOC000000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a306.84/80973 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aKimport, Katrina _eautore
245	1	0	_aQueering Marriage : _bChallenging Family Formation in the United States / _cKatrina Kimport.
264		1	_aNew Brunswick, NJ : _bRutgers University Press, _c[2013]
264		4	_c©2013
300			_a1 online resource (192 p.) : _b2 figures, 3 tables
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aFamilies in Focus
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _t1. The Winter of Love -- _t2. Marrying for the Movement -- _t3. Marrying for Rights -- _t4. Marrying for Love -- _t5. Gender and Parenthood -- _t6. The Persistent Power of Marriage -- _t7. Exposing Heteronormativity -- _t8. Conclusion -- _tMethodological Appendix -- _tNotes -- _tReferences -- _tIndex -- _tAbout the Author
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aOver four thousand gay and lesbian couples married in the city of San Francisco in 2004. The first large-scale occurrence of legal same-sex marriage, these unions galvanized a movement and reignited the debate about whether same-sex marriage, as some hope, challenges heterosexual privilege or, as others fear, preserves that privilege by assimilating queer couples. In Queering Marriage, Katrina Kimport uses in-depth interviews with participants in the San Francisco weddings to argue that same-sex marriage cannot be understood as simply entrenching or contesting heterosexual privilege. Instead, she contends, these new legally sanctioned relationships can both reinforce as well as disrupt the association of marriage and heterosexuality. During her deeply personal conversations with same-sex spouses, Kimport learned that the majority of respondents did characterize their marriages as an opportunity to contest heterosexual privilege. Yet, in a seeming contradiction, nearly as many also cited their desire for access to the normative benefits of matrimony, including social recognition and legal rights. Kimport's research revealed that the pattern of ascribing meaning to marriage varied by parenthood status and, in turn, by gender. Lesbian parents were more likely to embrace normative meanings for their unions; those who are not parents were more likely to define their relationships as attempts to contest dominant understandings of marriage. By posing the question-can queers "queer" marriage?-Kimport provides a nuanced, accessible, and theoretically grounded framework for understanding the powerful effect of heterosexual expectations on both sexual and social categories.
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)
650		0	_aGay rights _zCalifornia _zSan Francisco.
650		0	_aGay rights _zUnited States.
650		0	_aSame-sex marriage _zCalifornia _zSan Francisco.
650		0	_aSame-sex marriage _zUnited States.
650		7	_aSOCIAL SCIENCE / General. _2bisacsh
653			_aNational marriage equality movement.
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.36019/9780813562230
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780813562230
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780813562230.jpg
942			_cEB
999			_c200044 _d200044