| 000 | 03565nam a22005295i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 200751 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20240316185351.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 240306t20201997nyu fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780814726433 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9780814728871 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.18574/nyu/9780814728871.001.0001 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9780814728871 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)547624 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)782877940 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aKF4757 _b.F59 1998eb |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW013000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a346.7301/3 _221 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aFlagg, Barbara J. _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aWas Blind, But Now I See : _bWhite Race Concsiousness and the Law / _cBarbara J. Flagg. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aNew York, NY : _bNew York University Press, _c[2020] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©1997 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aCritical America ; _v61 |
|
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _t1. Introduction -- _t2. An Overview of Race and Racism -- _t3. The Constitutional Requirement of Discriminatory Intent -- _t4. Constitutional Qualms -- _t5. Disparate Impact under Title VII -- _t6. Statutory Interpretation -- _t7. Notes on Doctrinal Reform -- _tNotes -- _tIndex -- _tAbout the Author |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _a"Race" does not speak to most white people. Rather, whites tend to associate race with people of color and to equate whiteness with racelessness. As Barbara J. Flagg demonstrates in this important book, this "transparency" phenomenon--the invisibility of whiteness to white people-- profoundly affects the ways in whites make decisions: they rely on criteria perceived by the decisionmaker as race-neutral but which in fact reflect white, race-specific norms. Flagg here identifies this transparently white decisionmaking as a form of institutional racism that contributes significantly, though unobtrusively, to the maintenance of white supremacy. Bringing the discussion to bear on the arena of law, Flagg analyzes key areas of race discrimination law and makes the case for reforms that would bring legal doctrine into greater harmony with the recognition of institutional racism in general and the transparency phenomenon in particular. She concludes with an exploration of the meaning of whiteness in a pluralist culture, paving the way for a positive, nonracist conception of whiteness as a distinct racial identity. An informed and substantive call for doctrinal reform, Was Blind But Now I See is the most expansive treatment yet of the relationship between whiteness and law. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 06. Mrz 2024) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aAfrican Americans _xLegal status, laws, etc. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aRace discrimination _xLaw and legislation _zUnited States. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Civil Rights. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814728871.001.0001 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780814728871 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780814728871/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c200751 _d200751 |
||