000			03514nam a2200481Ia 4500
001			201348
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20231211163301.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			231101t20082008nyu fo d z eng d
020			_a9780814794487 _qprint
020			_a9780814769119 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.18574/nyu/9780814769119.001.0001 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780814769119
035			_a(DE-B1597)547428
035			_a(OCoLC)779828470
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
072		7	_aPHI019000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a341.01 _222
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aWilliams, Melissa S. _eautore
245	1	0	_aMoral Universalism and Pluralism : _bNOMOS XLIX / _cMelissa S. Williams; ed. by Henry S. Richardson.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bNew York University Press, _c[2008]
264		4	_c©2008
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aNOMOS - American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy ; _v9
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aMoral universalism, or the idea that some system of ethics applies to all people regardless of race, color, nationality, religion, or culture, must have a plurality over which to range - a plurality of diverse persons, nations, jurisdictions, or localities over which morality asserts a universal authority. The contributors to Moral Universalism and Pluralism, the latest volume in the NOMOS series, investigate the idea that, far from denying the existence of such pluralities, moral universalism presupposes it. At the same time, the search for universally valid principles of morality is deeply challenged by diversity. The fact of pluralism presses us to explore how universalist principles interact with ethical, political, and social particularisms. These important essays refuse the answer that particularisms should simply be made to conform to universal principles, as if morality were a mold into which the diverse matter of human society and culture could be pressed. Rather, the authors bring philosophical, legal and political perspectives to bear on the core questions: Which forms of pluralism are conceptually compatible with moral universalism, and which ones can be accommodated in a politically stable way? Can pluralism generate innovations in understandings of moral duty? How is convergence on the validity of legal and moral authority possible in circumstances of pluralism? As the contributors to the book demonstrate in a wide variety of ways, these normative, conceptual, and political questions deeply intertwine.Contributors: Kenneth Baynes, William A. Galston, Barbara Herman, F. M. Kamm, Benedict Kingsbury, Frank I. Michelman, William E. Scheuerman, Gopal Sreenivasan, Daniel Weinstock, and Robin West.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Nov 2023)
650		7	_aPHILOSOPHY / Political. _2bisacsh
700	1		_aRichardson, Henry S. _ecuratore
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780814769119
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780814769119/original
942			_cEB
999			_c201348 _d201348