000			03863nam a22005175i 4500
001			201457
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20240316185405.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			240306t20012001nyu fo d z eng d
020			_a9780814775387 _qprint
020			_a9780814776773 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.18574/nyu/9780814776773.001.0001 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780814776773
035			_a(DE-B1597)547956
035			_a(OCoLC)55638574
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aJK1991 _b.R423 2001eb
072		7	_aPOL008000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a323.44/3/0973 _221
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aRedish, Martin H. _eautore
245	1	0	_aMoney Talks : _bSpeech, Economic Power, and the Values of Democracy / _cMartin H. Redish.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bNew York University Press, _c[2001]
264		4	_c©2001
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface -- _t1. Introduction: The Intersection between Free Speech and Economic Power -- _t2. Commercial Speech and Democratic Values -- _t3. Corporate Speech and the Theory of Free Expression -- _t4. Free Speech and the Flawed Postulates of Campaign Finance Regulation -- _t5. The Right of Expressive Access, Redistributive Values, and the Democratic Dilemma -- _t6. Government Subsidies and Free Expression -- _t7. Conclusion: Free Expression and the Sound of Money -- _tNotes -- _tIndex -- _tAbout the Author
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aMany have argued that soft money and special interests are destroying the American electoral system. And yet the clarion call for campaign finance reform only touches on the more general belief that money and economic power have a disastrous impact on both free expression and American democracy. The nation's primary sources of communication, the argument goes, are increasingly controlled by vast corporate empires whose primary, or even exclusive motive is the maximization of profit. And these conglomerates should simply not be granted the same constitutional protection as, say, an individual protester. And yet neither the expenditure of money for expressive purposes nor an underlying motive of profit maximization detracts from the values fostered by such activity, claims Martin H. Redish. In fact, given the modern economic realities that dictate that effective expression virtually requires the expenditure of capital, any restriction of such capital for expressive purposes will necessarily reduce the sum total of available expression. Further, Redish here illustrates, the underlying motive of those who wish to restrict corporate expression is disagreement with the nature of the views they express. Confronting head-on one of the sacred cows of American reformist politics, Martin H. Redish here once again lives up to his reputation as one of America's most original and counterintuitive legal minds.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 06. Mrz 2024)
650		0	_aCampaign funds _zUnited States.
650		0	_aFreedom of speech _zUnited States.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Campaigns & Elections. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814776773.001.0001
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780814776773
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780814776773/original
942			_cEB
999			_c201457 _d201457