000 03446nam a22006855i 4500
001 202000
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20230501181836.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 230103t20142014nyu fo d z eng d
020 _a9780823262694
_qprint
020 _a9780823262717
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9780823262717
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9780823262717
035 _a(DE-B1597)555399
035 _a(OCoLC)1040682913
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aBF575.R35
_b.G64 2015eb
072 7 _aLIT006000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a126
_223
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aGoh, Irving
_eautore
245 1 4 _aThe Reject :
_bCommunity, Politics, and Religion after the Subject /
_cIrving Goh.
264 1 _aNew York, NY :
_bFordham University Press,
_c[2014]
264 4 _c©2014
300 _a1 online resource (384 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aCommonalities
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tPreface: A Book For Everyone --
_tAcknowledgments --
_t1. Introduction --
_t2. (After) Friendship, Love, and Community --
_t3. The Reject And The “Postsecular,” or Who’s Afraid of Religion --
_t4. Prolegomenon to Reject Politics --
_t5. Clinamen, or the Auto-Reject for “Posthuman” Futures. --
_t6. Conclusion --
_tNotes --
_tWorks Cited --
_tIndex --
_tCommonalities
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aThis book proposes a theory of the reject, a more adequate figure than the subject for thinking friendship, love, community, democracy, the postsecular, and the posthuman.Through close readings of Nancy, Deleuze, Derrida, Cixous, Clement, Bataille, Balibar, Ranciere, and Badiou, Goh shows how the reject has always been nascent in contemporary French thought. The recent turn to animals and bare life, as well as the rise of the Occupy movement, he argues, presents a special urgency to think the reject today.Thinking the reject most importantly helps to advance our commitment to affirm others without acculturating their differences. But the reject also offers, Goh proposes, a response finally commensurate with the radical horizon of Nancy’s question of who comes after the subject.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 03. Jan 2023)
650 0 _aMarginality, Social.
650 0 _aOutcasts.
650 0 _aRejection (Psychology).
650 4 _aPhilosophy & Theory.
650 4 _aPolitical Science.
650 4 _aReligion.
650 7 _aLITERARY CRITICISM / Semiotics & Theory.
_2bisacsh
653 _aCixous.
653 _aDerrida.
653 _aIncompossible.
653 _aNancy.
653 _aPost-Secular.
653 _aPosthuman.
653 _aReject.
653 _aSubject.
700 1 _aCampbell, Timothy C.
_eautore
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780823262717?locatt=mode:legacy
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780823262717
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780823262717/original
942 _cEB
999 _c202000
_d202000