000			04114nam a22006255i 4500
001			202101
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214233312.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220302t20162016nyu fo d z eng d
020			_a9780823269945 _qprint
020			_a9780823269969 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.1515/9780823269969 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9780823269969
035			_a(DE-B1597)554961
035			_a(OCoLC)1058964055
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
072		7	_aLIT015000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a822.33 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aKuzner, James _eautore
245	1	0	_aShakespeare as a Way of Life : _bSkeptical Practice and the Politics of Weakness / _cJames Kuzner.
264		1	_aNew York, NY : _bFordham University Press, _c[2016]
264		4	_c©2016
300			_a1 online resource (232 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tIntroduction: Shakespeare's Skeptical Practice and the Politics of Weakness -- _tChapter 1. Ciceronian Skepticism and the Mind- Body Problem in Lucrece -- _tChapter 2. "It stops me here": Love and Self- Control in Othello -- _tChapter 3. The Winter's Tale: Faith in Law and the Law of Faith -- _tChapter 4. Doubtful Freedom in Th e Tempest -- _tChapter 5. Looking Two Ways at Once in Timon of Athens -- _tEpilogue: Shakespeare as a Way of Life -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tNotes -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aShakespeare as a Way of Life shows how reading Shakespeare helps us to live with epistemological weakness and even to practice this weakness, to make it a way of life. In a series of close readings, Kuzner shows how Hamlet, Lucrece, Othello, The Winter's Tale, The Tempest, and Timon of Athens, impel us to grapple with basic uncertainties: how we can be free, whether the world is abundant, whether we have met the demands of love and social life.To Kuzner, Shakespeare's skepticism doesn't have the enabling potential of Keats's heroic "negativity capability," but neither is that skepticism the corrosive disease that necessarily issues in tragedy. While sensitive to both possibilities, Kuzner offers a way to keep negative capability negative while making skepticism livable. Rather than light the way to empowered, liberal subjectivity, Shakespeare's works demand lasting disorientation, demand that we practice the impractical so as to reshape the frames by which we view and negotiate the world.The act of reading Shakespeare cannot yield the practical value that cognitive scientists and literary critics attribute to it. His work neither clarifies our sense of ourselves, of others, or of the world; nor heartens us about the human capacity for insight and invention; nor sharpens our ability to appreciate and adjudicate complex problems of ethics and politics. Shakespeare's plays, rather, yield cognitive discomforts, and it is just these discomforts that make them worthwhile.
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
650		4	_aLiterary Studies.
650		4	_aRenaissance Studies.
650		7	_aLITERARY CRITICISM / Shakespeare. _2bisacsh
653			_aCognitive Science.
653			_aFreedom.
653			_aLove.
653			_aPolitical Theology.
653			_aShakespeare.
653			_aSkepticism.
653			_aaesthetics.
653			_aethics.
653			_apolitics.
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9780823269969?locatt=mode:legacy
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780823269969
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780823269969/original
942			_cEB
999			_c202101 _d202101