000 04043nam a22005535i 4500
001 205419
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214233523.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 190708s2009 nju fo d z eng d
020 _a9780691117201
_qprint
020 _a9781400824823
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9781400824823
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781400824823
035 _a(DE-B1597)446185
035 _a(OCoLC)979631547
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aJC574.G48 2001
072 7 _aPHI005000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a320.51
_221
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aGeuss, Raymond
_eautore
245 1 0 _aPublic Goods, Private Goods /
_cRaymond Geuss.
250 _aWith a New preface by the author
264 1 _aPrinceton, NJ :
_bPrinceton University Press,
_c[2009]
264 4 _c©2001
300 _a1 online resource
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aPrinceton Monographs in Philosophy ;
_v22
505 0 0 _t Frontmatter --
_tCONTENTS --
_tPREFACE --
_tCHAPTER I. Introduction --
_tCHAPTER II. Shamelessness and the Public World --
_tCHAPTER III. Res Publica --
_tCHAPTER IV. The Spiritual and the Private --
_tCHAPTER V. Liberalism --
_tCHAPTER VI. Conclusion --
_tNOTES --
_tREFERENCES --
_tINDEX
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aMuch political thinking today, particularly that influenced by liberalism, assumes a clear distinction between the public and the private, and holds that the correct understanding of this should weigh heavily in our attitude to human goods. It is, for instance, widely held that the state may address human action in the ''public'' realm but not in the ''private.'' In Public Goods, Private Goods Raymond Geuss exposes the profound flaws of such thinking and calls for a more nuanced approach. Drawing on a series of colorful examples from the ancient world, he illustrates some of the many ways in which actions can in fact be understood as public or private. The first chapter discusses Diogenes the Cynic, who flouted conventions about what should be public and what should be private by, among other things, masturbating in the Athenian marketplace. Next comes an analysis of Julius Caesar's decision to defy the Senate by crossing the Rubicon with his army; in doing so, Caesar asserted his dignity as a private person while acting in a public capacity. The third chapter considers St. Augustine's retreat from public life to contemplate his own, private spiritual condition. In the fourth, Geuss goes on to examine recent liberal views, questioning, in particular, common assumptions about the importance of public dialogue and the purportedly unlimited possibilities humans have for reaching consensus. He suggests that the liberal concern to maintain and protect, even at a very high cost, an inviolable ''private sphere'' for each individual is confused. Geuss concludes that a view of politics and morality derived from Hobbes and Nietzsche is a more realistic and enlightening way than modern liberalism to think about human goods. Ultimately, he cautions, a simplistic understanding of privacy leads to simplistic ideas about what the state is and is not justified in doing.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 08. Jul 2019)
650 0 _aLiberalism.
650 0 _aMoral conditions.
650 0 _aPolitical ethics.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400824823
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400824823.jpg
942 _cEB
999 _c205419
_d205419