| 000 | 03282nam a22005295i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 205916 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214233542.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 190708s2009 nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 | 
_a9780691158129 _qprint  | 
||
| 020 | 
_a9781400831210 _qPDF  | 
||
| 024 | 7 | 
_a10.1515/9781400831210 _2doi  | 
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781400831210 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)446639 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)979910773 | ||
| 040 | 
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda  | 
||
| 050 | 4 | _aBJ1431.M28 2010 | |
| 072 | 7 | 
_aPHI019000 _2bisacsh  | 
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | 
_a170 _222  | 
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 | 
_aMargalit, Avishai _eautore  | 
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | 
_aOn Compromise and Rotten Compromises / _cAvishai Margalit.  | 
| 250 | _aCourse Book | ||
| 264 | 1 | 
_aPrinceton, NJ :  _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2009]  | 
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2009 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource | ||
| 336 | 
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent  | 
||
| 337 | 
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia  | 
||
| 338 | 
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier  | 
||
| 347 | 
_atext file _bPDF _2rda  | 
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | 
_t Frontmatter --  _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction: Why Compromise? -- _t1. Two Pictures of Political Compromise -- _t2. Varieties of Compromise -- _t3. Compromising for Peace -- _t4. Compromise and Political Necessity -- _t5. The Morality of Rotten Compromises -- _t6. Sectarianism and Compromise -- _tConclusion: Between Evil and Radical Evil -- _tNotes -- _tIndex  | 
| 506 | 0 | 
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star  | 
|
| 520 | _aWhen is political compromise acceptable--and when is it fundamentally rotten, something we should never accept, come what may? What if a rotten compromise is politically necessary? Compromise is a great political virtue, especially for the sake of peace. But, as Avishai Margalit argues, there are moral limits to acceptable compromise even for peace. But just what are those limits? At what point does peace secured with compromise become unjust? Focusing attention on vitally important questions that have received surprisingly little attention, Margalit argues that we should be concerned not only with what makes a just war, but also with what kind of compromise allows for a just peace. Examining a wide range of examples, including the Munich Agreement, the Yalta Conference, and Arab-Israeli peace negotiations, Margalit provides a searching examination of the nature of political compromise in its various forms. Combining philosophy, politics, and history, and written in a vivid and accessible style, On Compromise and Rotten Compromises is full of surprising new insights about war, peace, justice, and sectarianism. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 08. Jul 2019) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aCompromise (Ethics). | |
| 650 | 0 | 
_aPolitical science _xPhilosophy.  | 
|
| 650 | 7 | 
_aPHILOSOPHY / Political. _2bisacsh  | 
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831210 | 
| 856 | 4 | 2 | 
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400831210.jpg  | 
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 | 
_c205916 _d205916  | 
||