000			03935nam a22006135i 4500
001			206175
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214233552.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			210729t20102010nju fo d z eng d
020			_a9780691132907 _qprint
020			_a9781400835126 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.1515/9781400835126 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9781400835126
035			_a(DE-B1597)446908
035			_a(OCoLC)979579415
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aJZ1234
072		7	_aPOL010000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a327.1072 _222
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aLebow, Richard Ned _eautore
245	1	0	_aForbidden Fruit : _bCounterfactuals and International Relations / _cRichard Ned Lebow.
250			_aCourse Book
264		1	_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2010]
264		4	_c©2010
300			_a1 online resource (352 p.) : _b4 line illus. 14 tables.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tPART ONE -- _tCHAPTER ONE. Making Sense of the World -- _tCHAPTER TWO. Counterfactual Thought Experiments -- _tPART TWO -- _tChapter Three. Franz Ferdinand Found Alive: World War I Unnecessary -- _tChapter Four. Leadership and the End of the Cold War: Did It Have to End This Way? -- _tPART THREE -- _tCHAPTER FIVE. Scholars and Causation 1 -- _tCHAPTER SIX. Scholars and Causation 2 -- _tCHAPTER EIGHT. Heil to the Chief: Sinclair Lewis, Philip Roth, and Fascism -- _tConclusions -- _tNotes -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aCould World War I have been averted if Franz Ferdinand and his wife hadn't been murdered by Serbian nationalists in 1914? What if Ronald Reagan had been killed by Hinckley's bullet? Would the Cold War have ended as it did? In Forbidden Fruit, Richard Ned Lebow develops protocols for conducting robust counterfactual thought experiments and uses them to probe the causes and contingency of transformative international developments like World War I and the end of the Cold War. He uses experiments, surveys, and a short story to explore why policymakers, historians, and international relations scholars are so resistant to the contingency and indeterminism inherent in open-ended, nonlinear systems. Most controversially, Lebow argues that the difference between counterfactual and so-called factual arguments is misleading, as both can be evidence-rich and logically persuasive. A must-read for social scientists, Forbidden Fruit also examines the binary between fact and fiction and the use of counterfactuals in fictional works like Philip Roth's The Plot Against America to understand complex causation and its implications for who we are and what we think makes the social world work.
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2021)
650		0	_aCold War.
650		0	_aImaginary histories.
650		0	_aInternational relations _vResearch.
650		0	_aInternational relations _xResearch.
650		0	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE _xHistory &amp _xTheory.
650		0	_aPolitical science _xHistory and amp _xTheory.
650		0	_aWorld politics _vResearch.
650		0	_aWorld politics _xResearch.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835126
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400835126
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400835126.jpg
942			_cEB
999			_c206175 _d206175