000			04210nam a22005415i 4500
001			206303
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214233558.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			210830t20102006nju fo d z eng d
020			_a9780691138305 _qprint
020			_a9781400837274 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.1515/9781400837274 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9781400837274
035			_a(DE-B1597)446603
035			_a(OCoLC)979593512
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aJZ5588
072		7	_aPOL011000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a355.0330001
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aDeudney, Daniel H. _eautore
245	1	0	_aBounding Power : _bRepublican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village / _cDaniel H. Deudney.
250			_aCourse Book
264		1	_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2010]
264		4	_c©2006
300			_a1 online resource (384 p.) : _b37 line illus.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tFigures -- _tPreface and Acknowledgments -- _tIntroduction. Before Realism and Liberalism -- _tPART I Traditions and Theory -- _tChapter One. Republican Security Theory -- _tChapter Two. Relatives and Descendants -- _tPART II. From the Polis to Federal Union -- _tChapter Three. The Iron Laws of Polis Republicanism -- _tChapter Four. Maritime Whiggery -- _tChapter Five. The Natural 'Republic' of Europe -- _tChapter Six. The Philadelphian System -- _tPART III. Toward The Global Village -- _tChapter Seven. Liberal Historical Materialism -- _tChapter Eight. Federalist Global Geopolitics -- _tChapter Nine. Anticipations of World Nuclear Government -- _tConclusion -- _tNotes -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aRealism, the dominant theory of international relations, particularly regarding security, seems compelling in part because of its claim to embody so much of Western political thought from the ancient Greeks to the present. Its main challenger, liberalism, looks to Kant and nineteenth-century economists. Despite their many insights, neither realism nor liberalism gives us adequate tools to grapple with security globalization, the liberal ascent, and the American role in their development. In reality, both realism and liberalism and their main insights were largely invented by republicans writing about republics. The main ideas of realism and liberalism are but fragments of republican security theory, whose primary claim is that security entails the simultaneous avoidance of the extremes of anarchy and hierarchy, and that the size of the space within which this is necessary has expanded due to technological change. In Daniel Deudney's reading, there is one main security tradition and its fragmentary descendants. This theory began in classical antiquity, and its pivotal early modern and Enlightenment culmination was the founding of the United States. Moving into the industrial and nuclear eras, this line of thinking becomes the basis for the claim that mutually restraining world government is now necessary for security and that political liberty cannot survive without new types of global unions. Unique in scope, depth, and timeliness, Bounding Power offers an international political theory for our fractious and perilous global village.
530			_aIssued also in print.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)
650		0	_aConservatism.
650		0	_aSecurity, International _xPhilosophy.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / General. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400837274
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400837274
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400837274.jpg
942			_cEB
999			_c206303 _d206303