| 000 | 04971nam a22009255i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 206501 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214233606.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210729t20112012nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780691144689 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781400840311 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9781400840311 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781400840311 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)453771 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)979579308 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aJK1764 _b.B465 2017 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL007000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a323.0420973 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aBerger, Ben _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAttention Deficit Democracy : _bThe Paradox of Civic Engagement / _cBen Berger. |
| 250 | _aCourse Book | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2011] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2012 | |
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (224 p.) : _b2 line illus. 2 tables. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface -- _tChapter 1. Introduction -- _tChapter 2. The rules of engagement -- _tChapter 3. Political Engagement as Intrinsic Good: Arendt and Company -- _tChapter 4. Political Engagement as Instrumental Good: Tocqueville, Attention Deficit, and Energy -- _tChapter 5. Is Political Engagement Better Than Sex? -- _tChapter 6. Conclusion: Tocqueville vs. the Full Monty -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aHandwringing about political apathy is as old as democracy itself. As early as 425 BC, the playwright Aristophanes ridiculed his fellow Athenians for gossiping in the market instead of voting. In more recent decades, calls for greater civic engagement as a democratic cure-all have met with widespread agreement. But how realistic--or helpful--is it to expect citizens to devote more attention and energy to politics? In Attention Deficit Democracy, Ben Berger provides a surprising new perspective on the problem of civic engagement, challenging idealists who aspire to revolutionize democracies and their citizens, but also taking issue with cynics who think that citizens cannot--and need not--do better. "Civic engagement" has become an unwieldy and confusing catchall, Berger argues. We should talk instead of political, social, and moral engagement, figuring out which kinds of engagement make democracy work better, and how we might promote them. Focusing on political engagement and taking Alexis de Tocqueville and Hannah Arendt as his guides, Berger identifies ways to achieve the political engagement we want and need without resorting to coercive measures such as compulsory national service or mandatory voting. By providing a realistic account of the value of political engagement and practical strategies for improving it, while avoiding proposals we can never hope to achieve, Attention Deficit Democracy makes a persuasive case for a public philosophy that much of the public can actually endorse. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2021) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aDemocracy. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aPolitical participation _zUnited States. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political ideologies / Democracy. _2bisacsh |
|
| 653 | _aAlexis de Tocqueville. | ||
| 653 | _aHannah Arendt. | ||
| 653 | _aattention deficit. | ||
| 653 | _aattention. | ||
| 653 | _acivic engagement. | ||
| 653 | _acivil associations. | ||
| 653 | _ademocracy. | ||
| 653 | _aenergy. | ||
| 653 | _ainstrumental good. | ||
| 653 | _ainstrumental value. | ||
| 653 | _aintrinsic good. | ||
| 653 | _aintrinsic value. | ||
| 653 | _ainvisibility. | ||
| 653 | _aisolation. | ||
| 653 | _aliberal democracy. | ||
| 653 | _amaterialism. | ||
| 653 | _amoral engagement. | ||
| 653 | _aparticipatory democracy. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical apathy. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical associations. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical education. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical engagement. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical governance. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical institutions. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical mobilization. | ||
| 653 | _apolitics. | ||
| 653 | _apublic freedom. | ||
| 653 | _apublic philosophy. | ||
| 653 | _aself-interest. | ||
| 653 | _asocial engagement. | ||
| 653 | _atotalitarianism. | ||
| 653 | _atownship administration. | ||
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840311?locatt=mode:legacy |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400840311 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400840311.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c206501 _d206501 |
||