| 000 | 05753nam a22012015i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 206619 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214233611.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210729t20122013nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780691144467 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781400842391 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9781400842391 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781400842391 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)453813 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)979594080 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aJC574 _b.T657 2017 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI019000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a330.122 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aTomasi, John _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFree Market Fairness / _cJohn Tomasi. |
| 250 | _aCourse Book | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2012] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2013 | |
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (384 p.) : _b3 tables. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction -- _tChapter 1. Classical Liberalism -- _tChapter 2. High Liberalism -- _tChapter 3. Thinking the Unthinkable -- _tChapter 4. Market Democracy -- _tChapter 5. Social Justicitis -- _tChapter 6. Two Concepts of Fairness -- _tChapter 7. Feasibility, Normativity, and Institutional Guarantees -- _tChapter 8. Free Market Fairness -- _tConclusion -- _tNotes -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aCan libertarians care about social justice? In Free Market Fairness, John Tomasi argues that they can and should. Drawing simultaneously on moral insights from defenders of economic liberty such as F. A. Hayek and advocates of social justice such as John Rawls, Tomasi presents a new theory of liberal justice. This theory, free market fairness, is committed to both limited government and the material betterment of the poor. Unlike traditional libertarians, Tomasi argues that property rights are best defended not in terms of self-ownership or economic efficiency but as requirements of democratic legitimacy. At the same time, he encourages egalitarians concerned about social justice to listen more sympathetically to the claims ordinary citizens make about the importance of private economic liberty in their daily lives. In place of the familiar social democratic interpretations of social justice, Tomasi offers a "market democratic" conception of social justice: free market fairness. Tomasi argues that free market fairness, with its twin commitment to economic liberty and a fair distribution of goods and opportunities, is a morally superior account of liberal justice. Free market fairness is also a distinctively American ideal. It extends the notion, prominent in America's founding period, that protection of property and promotion of real opportunity are indivisible goals. Indeed, according to Tomasi, free market fairness is social justice, American style. Provocative and vigorously argued, Free Market Fairness offers a bold new way of thinking about politics, economics, and justice--one that will challenge readers on both the left and right. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2021) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aCapitalism. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aEquality. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aFree enterprise. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aLiberalism. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aLiberty. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aPHILOSOPHY / Political. _2bisacsh |
|
| 653 | _aAdam Smith. | ||
| 653 | _aF. A. Hayek. | ||
| 653 | _aJean-Jacques Rousseau. | ||
| 653 | _aJohn Rawls. | ||
| 653 | _aJohn Stuart Mill. | ||
| 653 | _aclassical liberalism. | ||
| 653 | _ademocratic citizenship. | ||
| 653 | _ademocratic legitimacy. | ||
| 653 | _adifference principle. | ||
| 653 | _adistribution. | ||
| 653 | _adistributional adequacy condition. | ||
| 653 | _adistributive justice. | ||
| 653 | _aeconomic exceptionalism. | ||
| 653 | _aeconomic freedom. | ||
| 653 | _aeconomic growth. | ||
| 653 | _aeconomic liberty. | ||
| 653 | _aeconomics. | ||
| 653 | _aenvironmental justice. | ||
| 653 | _aequality. | ||
| 653 | _afairness. | ||
| 653 | _afeasibility. | ||
| 653 | _afree market fairness. | ||
| 653 | _ahigh liberalism. | ||
| 653 | _aideal theory. | ||
| 653 | _ainstitutional guarantees. | ||
| 653 | _ainstitutions. | ||
| 653 | _ainternational aid. | ||
| 653 | _ajust savings principle. | ||
| 653 | _ajustice as fairness. | ||
| 653 | _ajustice. | ||
| 653 | _aleft liberalism. | ||
| 653 | _aliberal justice. | ||
| 653 | _aliberal theory. | ||
| 653 | _alibertarianism. | ||
| 653 | _amarket democracy. | ||
| 653 | _amarket society. | ||
| 653 | _anatural liberty. | ||
| 653 | _aopportunity. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical philosophy. | ||
| 653 | _apolitics. | ||
| 653 | _apoor. | ||
| 653 | _apopulism. | ||
| 653 | _aproperty rights. | ||
| 653 | _aproperty. | ||
| 653 | _arealistic utopianism. | ||
| 653 | _asocial democracy. | ||
| 653 | _asocial justice. | ||
| 653 | _asocial justicitis. | ||
| 653 | _asocial order. | ||
| 653 | _asocial service programs. | ||
| 653 | _aspontaneous order. | ||
| 653 | _ataxation. | ||
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842391?locatt=mode:legacy |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400842391 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400842391.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c206619 _d206619 |
||