| 000 | 03557nam a22005535i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 207646 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214233653.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210830t20141980nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780691609768 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781400857272 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9781400857272 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781400857272 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)448208 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)979580159 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aPR2819 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aDRA010000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a822/.3/3 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aUrkowitz, Steven _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aShakespeare's Revision of KING LEAR / _cSteven Urkowitz. |
| 250 | _aCourse Book | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2014] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©1980 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (182 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aPrinceton Essays in Literature ; _v634 |
|
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tCONTENTS -- _tACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- _tCHAPTER I Current Opinions on the Texts of King Lear -- _tCHAPTER II Textual Variants in Dramatic Contexts -- _tCHAPTER III Textual Variants and Players' Entrances and Exits -- _tCHAPTER IV Interrupted Exits and the Textual Variants in Act Three, Scene One -- _tCHAPTER V The Role of Albany in the Quarto and Folio -- _tCHAPTER VI Contemporary Bibliographical Theories and Editorial Practices and the Case for Authorial Revision -- _tABBREVIATIONS OF FREQUENTLY CITED WORKS -- _tNOTES -- _tINDEX |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aOf the three texts of King Lear--the Quarto version printed in 1608, the Folio edition of 1623, and the modern composite of these two early texts--it has been assumed that both the Quarto and Folio versions arc distortions of an unblemished original" now lost and that only the modern text accurately approaches Shakespeare's lost original manuscript. Steven Urkowitz argues to the contrary that the Quarto and Folio are simply different stages of Shakespear's writing--an early draft and a final revision--and that they reveal much about his process of composition.Originally published in 1980.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aKings and rulers in literature. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aTragedy. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aDRAMA / Shakespeare. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400857272?locatt=mode:legacy |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400857272 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400857272.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c207646 _d207646 |
||