000 03899nam a22005415i 4500
001 207844
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214233701.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 210830t20141988nju fo d z eng d
019 _a(OCoLC)979755787
020 _a9780691605197
_qprint
020 _a9781400859573
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9781400859573
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781400859573
035 _a(DE-B1597)447127
035 _a(OCoLC)889251477
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
072 7 _aLAW018000
_2bisacsh
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aFisher, Louis
_eautore
245 1 0 _aConstitutional Dialogues :
_bInterpretation as Political Process /
_cLouis Fisher.
250 _aCourse Book
264 1 _aPrinceton, NJ :
_bPrinceton University Press,
_c[2014]
264 4 _c©1988
300 _a1 online resource (318 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aPrinceton Legacy Library ;
_v922
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tAcknowledgments --
_tIntroduction --
_t1. Public Law and Politics --
_t2. The Doctrine of Judicial Review --
_t3. Threshold Requirements: Husbanding Power and Prestige --
_t4. Judicial Organization --
_t5. Decisionmaking: Process and Strategy --
_t6. Efforts to Curb the Court --
_t7. Coordinate Construction --
_tConclusion --
_tSuggested Readings --
_tIndex of Cases --
_tGeneral Index
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aWho makes constitutional law? Is constitutional doctrine the monopoly of the courts? In accessible and persuasive prose Louis Fisher explains that constitutional law is not solely or even primarily the Supreme Court's "final word" but rather a richly political convergence of separate interpretations. With a broad range of examples, he argues that constitutional principles emerge from a dialogue among all three branches of government--executive, legislative, and judicial. Important contributions also come from the states and the general public. Fisher identifies executive and legislative initiatives in many areas of constitutional significance. Where there is litigation, the Court generally upholds these initiatives or may avoid making a constitutional decision by using "threshold devices." On those rare occasions when the Supreme Court exercises judicial review and strikes down a presidential or congressional action, it is usually only a matter of time before the proposal is revived and the dialogue begins again.Originally published in 1988.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)
650 0 _aConstitutional law
_zUnited States.
650 0 _aJudicial review
_zUnited States.
650 7 _aLAW / Constitutional.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400859573
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400859573
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400859573.jpg
942 _cEB
999 _c207844
_d207844