000 04259nam a22005895i 4500
001 207957
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214233705.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 210830t20141990nju fo d z eng d
020 _a9780691605029
_qprint
020 _a9781400860821
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9781400860821
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781400860821
035 _a(DE-B1597)447618
035 _a(OCoLC)979780461
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aPQ637.E6 -- M34 1990eb
072 7 _aLIT000000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a843.009
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aMacArthur, Elizabeth Jane
_eautore
245 1 0 _aExtravagant Narratives :
_bClosure and Dynamics in the Epistolary Form /
_cElizabeth Jane MacArthur.
250 _aCourse Book
264 1 _aPrinceton, NJ :
_bPrinceton University Press,
_c[2014]
264 4 _c©1990
300 _a1 online resource (308 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aPrinceton Legacy Library ;
_v1057
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tAcknowledgments --
_tIntroduction --
_tCHAPTER ONE. The Genesis of Epistolary Narrative in the Seventeenth Century --
_tCHAPTER TWO. Plotting a Metonymical Life Story: The Correspondence of Madame du Deffand and Horace Walpole --
_tCHAPTER THREE. The Open Dynamic of Narrative: Metaphor and Metonymy in Rousseau's Julie --
_tClosing --
_tBibliography --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aChallenging the view of epistolary narrative as a faulty precursor to the nineteenth-century realist novel, Elizabeth MacArthur argues that the openness and flexibility that characterize correspondences, both real and fictional, reflect the preoccupations of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Her readings of the Lettres portugaises, Mme du Deffand's correspondence with Horace Walpole, and Rousseau's La Nouvelle Hlose propose an alternative to closure-oriented theories of narrative as they uncover an interplay between two forces: a tendency towards closure and meaning (metaphor) and a tendency towards openness and desire (metonymy). While such an interplay structures all narrative, the epistolary form differs from the third or first person in the extent to which metonymy predominates. The author shows how critics and editors of correspondences have attempted to control their metonymy, channeling epistolary energy into univocal meaning. By juxtaposing real and fictional epistolary works, MacArthur reveals the similarities between the two, particularly their "extravagance": ambiguity, openness, and forward-moving energy.Originally published in 1990.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021)
650 0 _aClosure (Rhetoric).
650 0 _aEpistolary fiction, French
_xHistory and criticism.
650 0 _aFrench prose literature
_y17th century
_xHistory and criticism.
650 0 _aFrench prose literature
_y18th century
_xHistory and criticism.
650 0 _aNarration (Rhetoric).
650 7 _aLITERARY CRITICISM / General.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400860821
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400860821
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400860821.jpg
942 _cEB
999 _c207957
_d207957