000 05740nam a22010815i 4500
001 209630
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214233811.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 210824t20162017nju fo d z eng d
019 _a(OCoLC)984549969
020 _a9780691165103
_qprint
020 _a9781400883011
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9781400883011
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781400883011
035 _a(DE-B1597)479621
035 _a(OCoLC)957700372
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aHB103.A2
072 7 _aPHI019000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a330.1540941
_223
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aNacol, Emily
_eautore
245 1 3 _aAn Age of Risk :
_bPolitics and Economy in Early Modern Britain /
_cEmily Nacol.
264 1 _aPrinceton, NJ :
_bPrinceton University Press,
_c[2016]
264 4 _c©2017
300 _a1 online resource (184 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tAcknowledgments --
_tChapter One. Introduction --
_tChapter Two. "Experience Concludeth Nothing Universally". Hobbes and the Groundwork for a Political Theory of Risk --
_tChapter Three. The Risks of Political Authority. Trust, Knowledge, and Political Agency in Locke's Politics and Economy --
_tChapter Four. Hume's Fine Balance. On Probability, Fear, and the Risks of Trade --
_tChapter Five. Adventurous Spirits and Clamoring Sophists. Smith on the Problem of Risk in Political Economy --
_tChapter Six. An Age of Risk, a Liberalism of Anxiety --
_tNotes --
_tReferences --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aIn An Age of Risk, Emily Nacol shows that risk, now treated as a permanent feature of our lives, did not always govern understandings of the future. Focusing on the epistemological, political, and economic writings of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume, and Adam Smith, Nacol explains that in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain, political and economic thinkers reimagined the future as a terrain of risk, characterized by probabilistic calculation, prediction, and control.In these early modern sources, Nacol contends, we see three crucial developments in thought on risk and politics. While early modern thinkers differentiated uncertainty about the future from probabilistic calculations of risk, they remained attentive to the ways uncertainty and risk remained in a conceptual tangle, a problem that constrained good decision making. They developed sophisticated theories of trust and credit as crucial background conditions for prudent risk-taking, and offered complex depictions of the relationships and behaviors that would make risk-taking more palatable. They also developed two narratives that persist in subsequent accounts of risk-risk as a threat to security, and risk as an opportunity for profit. Looking at how these narratives are entwined in early modern thought, Nacol locates the origins of our own ambivalence about risk-taking. By the end of the eighteenth century, she argues, a new type of political actor would emerge from this ambivalence, one who approached risk with fear rather than hope.By placing a fresh lens on early modern writing, An Age of Risk demonstrates how new and evolving orientations toward risk influenced approaches to politics and commerce that continue to this day.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Aug 2021)
650 0 _aEconomics
_zGreat Britain
_xHistory
_y17th century.
650 0 _aEconomics
_zGreat Britain
_xHistory
_y18th century.
650 0 _aRisk
_xPhilosophy.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / Political.
_2bisacsh
653 _aAdam Smith.
653 _aDavid Hume.
653 _aJohn Locke.
653 _aLockean political trust.
653 _aMichel Foucault.
653 _aThomas Hobbes.
653 _acivil war.
653 _acommerce.
653 _acommercial actors.
653 _aearly modern Britain.
653 _aearly modern period.
653 _aeconomic risk.
653 _aeighteenth century.
653 _afuture uncertainty.
653 _ageometry.
653 _ahuman ambivalence.
653 _aknowledge.
653 _aliberalism.
653 _amercantile policies.
653 _amonopolies.
653 _amoral theory.
653 _anineteenth century.
653 _aphilosophical skepticism.
653 _apolitical authority.
653 _apolitical economy.
653 _apolitical order.
653 _apolitical risk.
653 _apolitical subject.
653 _apolitical theory.
653 _apolitical thought.
653 _apolitical trust.
653 _aprobabilistic calculation.
653 _aprobability.
653 _arisk control.
653 _arisk prediction.
653 _arisk taking.
653 _arisk-taking.
653 _arisk.
653 _asafe political community.
653 _asecurity threat.
653 _aseventeenth century.
653 _auncertainty.
653 _aunknown future.
653 _awritings.
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883011?locatt=mode:legacy
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400883011
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400883011.jpg
942 _cEB
999 _c209630
_d209630