| 000 | 05740nam a22010815i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 209630 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214233811.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210824t20162017nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)984549969 | ||
| 020 |
_a9780691165103 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781400883011 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9781400883011 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781400883011 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)479621 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)957700372 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aHB103.A2 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI019000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a330.1540941 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aNacol, Emily _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 3 |
_aAn Age of Risk : _bPolitics and Economy in Early Modern Britain / _cEmily Nacol. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2016] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2017 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (184 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tChapter One. Introduction -- _tChapter Two. "Experience Concludeth Nothing Universally". Hobbes and the Groundwork for a Political Theory of Risk -- _tChapter Three. The Risks of Political Authority. Trust, Knowledge, and Political Agency in Locke's Politics and Economy -- _tChapter Four. Hume's Fine Balance. On Probability, Fear, and the Risks of Trade -- _tChapter Five. Adventurous Spirits and Clamoring Sophists. Smith on the Problem of Risk in Political Economy -- _tChapter Six. An Age of Risk, a Liberalism of Anxiety -- _tNotes -- _tReferences -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aIn An Age of Risk, Emily Nacol shows that risk, now treated as a permanent feature of our lives, did not always govern understandings of the future. Focusing on the epistemological, political, and economic writings of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume, and Adam Smith, Nacol explains that in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain, political and economic thinkers reimagined the future as a terrain of risk, characterized by probabilistic calculation, prediction, and control.In these early modern sources, Nacol contends, we see three crucial developments in thought on risk and politics. While early modern thinkers differentiated uncertainty about the future from probabilistic calculations of risk, they remained attentive to the ways uncertainty and risk remained in a conceptual tangle, a problem that constrained good decision making. They developed sophisticated theories of trust and credit as crucial background conditions for prudent risk-taking, and offered complex depictions of the relationships and behaviors that would make risk-taking more palatable. They also developed two narratives that persist in subsequent accounts of risk-risk as a threat to security, and risk as an opportunity for profit. Looking at how these narratives are entwined in early modern thought, Nacol locates the origins of our own ambivalence about risk-taking. By the end of the eighteenth century, she argues, a new type of political actor would emerge from this ambivalence, one who approached risk with fear rather than hope.By placing a fresh lens on early modern writing, An Age of Risk demonstrates how new and evolving orientations toward risk influenced approaches to politics and commerce that continue to this day. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Aug 2021) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aEconomics _zGreat Britain _xHistory _y17th century. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aEconomics _zGreat Britain _xHistory _y18th century. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aRisk _xPhilosophy. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aPHILOSOPHY / Political. _2bisacsh |
|
| 653 | _aAdam Smith. | ||
| 653 | _aDavid Hume. | ||
| 653 | _aJohn Locke. | ||
| 653 | _aLockean political trust. | ||
| 653 | _aMichel Foucault. | ||
| 653 | _aThomas Hobbes. | ||
| 653 | _acivil war. | ||
| 653 | _acommerce. | ||
| 653 | _acommercial actors. | ||
| 653 | _aearly modern Britain. | ||
| 653 | _aearly modern period. | ||
| 653 | _aeconomic risk. | ||
| 653 | _aeighteenth century. | ||
| 653 | _afuture uncertainty. | ||
| 653 | _ageometry. | ||
| 653 | _ahuman ambivalence. | ||
| 653 | _aknowledge. | ||
| 653 | _aliberalism. | ||
| 653 | _amercantile policies. | ||
| 653 | _amonopolies. | ||
| 653 | _amoral theory. | ||
| 653 | _anineteenth century. | ||
| 653 | _aphilosophical skepticism. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical authority. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical economy. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical order. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical risk. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical subject. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical theory. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical thought. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical trust. | ||
| 653 | _aprobabilistic calculation. | ||
| 653 | _aprobability. | ||
| 653 | _arisk control. | ||
| 653 | _arisk prediction. | ||
| 653 | _arisk taking. | ||
| 653 | _arisk-taking. | ||
| 653 | _arisk. | ||
| 653 | _asafe political community. | ||
| 653 | _asecurity threat. | ||
| 653 | _aseventeenth century. | ||
| 653 | _auncertainty. | ||
| 653 | _aunknown future. | ||
| 653 | _awritings. | ||
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883011?locatt=mode:legacy |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400883011 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400883011.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c209630 _d209630 |
||