| 000 | 05044nam a22009375i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 209665 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221214233812.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210830t20162015nju fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9780691173047 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781400883486 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9781400883486 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781400883486 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)487943 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1024046148 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL042000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aBell, Daniel A. _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe China Model : _bPolitical Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy / _cDaniel A. Bell. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aPrinceton, NJ : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2016] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2015 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (360 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface to the Paperback Edition -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction -- _tChapter 1. Is Democracy the Least Bad Political System? -- _tChapter 2. On the Selection of Good Leaders in a Political Meritocracy -- _tChapter 3. What's Wrong with Political Meritocracy -- _tChapter 4. Three Models of Democratic Meritocracy -- _tConcluding Thoughts. Realizing the China Model -- _tNotes -- _tSelected Bibliography -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aWesterners tend to divide the political world into "good" democracies and "bad" authoritarian regimes. But the Chinese political model does not fit neatly in either category. Over the past three decades, China has evolved a political system that can best be described as "political meritocracy." The China Model seeks to understand the ideals and the reality of this unique political system. How do the ideals of political meritocracy set the standard for evaluating political progress (and regress) in China? How can China avoid the disadvantages of political meritocracy? And how can political meritocracy best be combined with democracy? Daniel Bell answers these questions and more.Opening with a critique of "one person, one vote" as a way of choosing top leaders, Bell argues that Chinese-style political meritocracy can help to remedy the key flaws of electoral democracy. He discusses the advantages and pitfalls of political meritocracy, distinguishes between different ways of combining meritocracy and democracy, and argues that China has evolved a model of democratic meritocracy that is morally desirable and politically stable. Bell summarizes and evaluates the "China model"-meritocracy at the top, experimentation in the middle, and democracy at the bottom-and its implications for the rest of the world.A timely and original book that will stir up interest and debate, The China Model looks at a political system that not only has had a long history in China, but could prove to be the most important political development of the twenty-first century. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aDemocracy _zChina. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aElite (Social sciences) _xPolitical activity _zChina. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMerit (Ethics) _xPolitical aspects _zChina. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aPolitical culture _zChina. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aPolitical leadership _zChina. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General. _2bisacsh |
|
| 653 | _aChina model. | ||
| 653 | _aChina. | ||
| 653 | _aJiang Qing. | ||
| 653 | _aJohn Stuart Mill. | ||
| 653 | _aLi Yuanchao. | ||
| 653 | _acompetitive individualists. | ||
| 653 | _acorruption. | ||
| 653 | _ademocracy. | ||
| 653 | _ademocratic meritocracy. | ||
| 653 | _aelections. | ||
| 653 | _aelectoral democracy. | ||
| 653 | _aexperimentation. | ||
| 653 | _alegitimacy. | ||
| 653 | _amajority. | ||
| 653 | _aminority. | ||
| 653 | _aone person. | ||
| 653 | _aone vote. | ||
| 653 | _aossification. | ||
| 653 | _aplural voting. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical leaders. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical meritocracy. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical participation. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical reform. | ||
| 653 | _apolitical system. | ||
| 653 | _apublic officials. | ||
| 653 | _apublic servants. | ||
| 653 | _areferendum. | ||
| 653 | _asocial skills. | ||
| 653 | _atricameral legislature. | ||
| 653 | _atyranny. | ||
| 653 | _avirtue. | ||
| 653 | _avoting community. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aBell, Daniel A. _eautore |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883486 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781400883486 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9781400883486.jpg |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c209665 _d209665 |
||