| 000 | 03627nam a22005415i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 211367 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20231211163631.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 231201t20142014onc fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9781442647688 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781442668904 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.3138/9781442668904 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781442668904 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)497198 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1046615245 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aQL84.24 _b.O45 2014eb |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL017000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a333.95/220971 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aOlive, Andrea _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLand, Stewardship, and Legitimacy : _bEndangered Species Policy in Canada and the United States / _cAndrea Olive. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aToronto : _bUniversity of Toronto Press, _c[2014] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2014 | |
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (304 p.) : _b8 figures |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tList of Tables -- _tList of Figures -- _tAcknowledgments -- _t1. Introduction -- _t2. The United States’ Endangered Species Act -- _t3. Canada’s Strategy for Species at Risk -- _t4. Willingness to Cooperate -- _t5. Private Property Meets Conservation -- _t6. Indiana, Utah, and Saskatchewan Case Studies -- _t7. Lake Erie Islands Case Study -- _t8. Indigenous Peoples and a Nunavut Case Study -- _t9. The Future of Conservation in Canada and the United States -- _tAppendix -- _tNotes -- _tReferences -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aCanada and the United States are similar in terms of the species of wildlife that mingle freely across their shared border. Despite this similarity, however, there are significant differences between approaches to wildlife management in these two nations. In Land, Stewardship, and Legitimacy, Andrea Olive examines the divergent evolution of endangered species policy on either side of the 49th parallel.Examining local circumstances in areas as distant and diverse as southern Utah and the Canadian Arctic, Olive shows how public attitudes have shaped environmental policy in response to endangered species law, specifically the Species at Risk Act in Canada and the Endangered Species Act in the U.S. Richly researched and accessibly written, this is the first book to compare endangered species policy on both sides of the Canada–U.S. border. It will appeal to students and scholars of environmental policy, politics, and ethics, and anyone interested in current approaches to wildlife management. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2023) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aEndangered species _xGovernment policy _zCanada. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aEndangered species _xGovernment policy _zUnited States. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aEndangered species _xLaw and legislation _zCanada. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aEndangered species _xLaw and legislation _zUnited States. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Affairs & Administration. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.3138/9781442668904 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442668904 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781442668904/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c211367 _d211367 |
||