| 000 | 03307nam a2200529Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 212703 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20231211163750.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 231101t20072007onc fo d z eng d | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)1013958050 | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)1154296608 | ||
| 020 |
_a9780802092281 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781442684973 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.3138/9781442684973 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781442684973 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)464082 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)944177068 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aPS3525.I5454 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aLIT000000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a818/.5209 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aBloshteyn, Maria _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe Making of a Counter-Culture Icon : _bHenry MIller's Dostoevsky / _cMaria Bloshteyn. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aToronto : _bUniversity of Toronto Press, _c[2007] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2007 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (240 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aAt first glance, the works of Fedor Dostoevsky (1821?1881) do not appear to have much in common with those of the controversial American writer Henry Miller (1891?1980). However, the influencer of Dostoevsky on Miller was, in fact, enormous and shaped the latter?s view of the world, of literature, and of his own writing. The Making of a Counter-Culture Icon examines the obsession that Miller and his contemporaries, the so-called Villa Seurat circle, had with Dostoevsky, and the impact that this obsession had on their own work.Renowned for his psychological treatment of characters, Dostoevsky became a model for Miller, Lawrence Durrell, and Anais Nin, interested as they were in developing a new kind of writing that would move beyond staid literary conventions. Maria Bloshteyn argues that, as Dostoevsky was concerned with representing the individual?s perception of the self and the world, he became an archetype for Miller and the other members of the Villa Seurat circle, writers who were interested in precise psychological characterizations as well as intriguing narratives. Tracing the cross-cultural appropriation and (mis)interpretation of Dostoevsky?s methods and philosophies by Miller, Durrell, and Nin, The Making of a Counter-Culture Icon gives invaluable insight into the early careers of the Villa Seurat writers and testifies to Dostoevsky?s influence on twentieth-century literature. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Nov 2023) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aCounterculture _xHistory _y20th century. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aExpatriate authors _zFrance _zParis. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aUnderground literature _xHistory and criticism. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLITERARY CRITICISM / General. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442684973 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781442684973/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c212703 _d212703 |
||