| 000 | 03503nam a2200541Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 212890 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20231211163803.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 231101t20082008onc fo d z eng d | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)1013945464 | ||
| 020 |
_a9780802097491 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781442687745 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.3138/9781442687745 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781442687745 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)465280 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)944176929 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aKE427 _b.L43 2008eb |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW001000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a340/.10971 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aLeckey, Robert _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aContextual Subjects : _bFamily, State, and Relational Theory / _cRobert Leckey. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aToronto : _bUniversity of Toronto Press, _c[2008] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2008 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (368 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aLaw and legal discourse both presuppose and produce legal subjects. Views on the nature of the legal subject will constantly shift, therefore, with changes in the law. Contextual Subjects argues that a new view of the legal subject has indeed emerged and that it is now embedded in the social context and relationships. This claim is developed through a contrast of Canadian family law and administrative law as it was in the mid-twentieth century and as it is today.Robert Leckey argues that it is not only the subject that is contextual. Legal discourse and adjudication have also become more contextual, making family law and administrative law themselves contextual subjects. Leckey bolsters this argument through the use of relational theory, a rich strand of feminist political theory that advocates a contextual method and seeks to promote constructive relationships that enable relational autonomy. Developments in family law and administrative law, therefore, exemplify the contextualism called for by relational theorists. Leckey points to the importance of contextualization, but he is not uncritical of relational theory, insisting that it should articulate more forcefully its normative vision of good relationships and offer clear recommendations in contested areas.Contextual Subjects is the most thorough and sustained application of relational theory to legal examples to appear to date. It is unique in Canadian legal scholarship for the way it pairs family law and administrative law, and within legal scholarship in English for its integration of common law and civil law. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Nov 2023) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aAdministrative law _zCanada. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aContextualism (Philosophy). | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aDomestic relations _zCanada. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aLaw _zCanada _xPhilosophy. |
|
| 650 | 4 | _aCoursebook. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442687745 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781442687745/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c212890 _d212890 |
||