000			04123nam a2200541Ia 4500
001			212898
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20231211163803.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			231101t20082008onc fo d z eng d
019			_a(OCoLC)1013961145
020			_a9780802090324 _qprint
020			_a9781442687837 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.3138/9781442687837 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9781442687837
035			_a(DE-B1597)465398
035			_a(OCoLC)944176846
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aTD898.13.C3
072		7	_aPOL016000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a363.72/8960971
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aFuji Johnson, Genevieve _eautore
245	1	0	_aDeliberative Democracy for the Future : _bThe Case of Nuclear Waste Management in Canada / _cGenevieve Fuji Johnson.
264		1	_aToronto : _bUniversity of Toronto Press, _c[2008]
264		4	_c©2008
300			_a1 online resource (240 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	0		_aStudies in Comparative Political Economy and Public Policy
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aIn today's world, public policies are increasingly associated with social and environmental risk and scientific uncertainty. Given such potential impacts on the moral freedom and equality for existing and future generations, policies should reflect decision-making standards beyond those of economic efficiency and technical safety. They should reflect the imperatives of social justice and democratic legitimacy now and into the future.Deliberative Democracy for the Future identifies an approach to ethical policy analysis that promises to serve the ends of justice and legitimacy in areas of public policy such as hazardous waste management, energy generation and regulation, climate change control, and genomics research and commercialization. Based on a wide reading of ethical approaches to policy analysis found in contemporary political theory, moral philosophy, and public policy literatures, it evaluates these three central approaches to ethical policy analysis in light of moral dilemmas arising in a particularly timely case: Canadian nuclear waste management policy.The volume's central argument is that the most desirable approach to ethical policy analysis contains the philosophical tools necessary to address problems of understanding risk and safety, identifying obligations to both existing and future generations, and conceptualizing legitimacy-conferring decision-making processes. Genevieve Fuji Johnson argues that neither welfare utilitarianism nor modern deontology is sufficiently equipped for these tasks. She proposes that only deliberative democracy contains convincing conceptions of the good, justice, and legitimacy that provide for the justifiable resolution of debates about the moral foundations of public policy. Responding to challenges in nuclear waste management in ways more comprehensive and more tenable than both utilitarianism and deontology, deliberative policy analysis promises to be an effective approach to other cases associated with risk, uncertainty, and futurity.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Nov 2023)
650		0	_aDeliberative democracy _zCanada.
650		0	_aRadioactive waste disposal _xGovernment policy _zCanada.
650		0	_aRadioactive waste disposal _xMoral and ethical aspects _zCanada.
650		0	_aRadioactive waste disposal _xRisk assessment _zCanada.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / General. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781442687837
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781442687837/original
942			_cEB
999			_c212898 _d212898