000 04236nam a22004935i 4500
001 218212
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214234343.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 220426t20211965txu fo d z eng d
020 _a9781477300763
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.7560/732070
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781477300763
035 _a(DE-B1597)587873
035 _a(OCoLC)1286808234
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
072 7 _aLIT000000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a823.912
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aCorke, Helen
_eautore
245 1 0 _aD. H. Lawrence :
_bThe Croydon Years /
_cHelen Corke.
264 1 _aAustin :
_bUniversity of Texas Press,
_c[2021]
264 4 _c©1965
300 _a1 online resource (172 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tINTRODUCTION --
_tPreface --
_tAcknowledgments --
_tCONTENTS --
_tList of Illustrations --
_tPortrait of D.H.Lawrence, 1909-1910 --
_tD. H. Lawrence's "Princess": A Memory of Jessie Chambers --
_tConcerning The White Peacock --
_tLawrence & Apocalypse --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aCroydon, England, was the setting of the famous three-way friendship of D. H. Lawrence, Jessie Chambers, and Helen Corke, all of whom made literary records of their association, and all of whom appeared as characters in Lawrence novels. Perhaps the most objective of these records were Helen Corke’s, which became difficult to acquire. Their scarcity and their continuing usefulness were the stimulus for publication of this volume, which contains in four statements Helen Corke’s “major comment on Lawrence the man and Lawrence the artist.” The “Portrait of D. H. Lawrence, 1909–1910,” a section from Corke’s unpublished autobiography, gives the reader glimpses into the earliest stages of the Lawrence-Corke friendship, when Lawrence worked to bring meaning back into Corke’s life after she had suffered a tragic loss. The “Portrait” tells of conversations before a log fire, German lessons, the reading of poetry, and sessions over Lawrence’s manuscript “Nethermere,” which the publishers renamed The White Peacock. In “Portrait,” Corke tells of working with Lawrence on revising the proofs of this book, of Lawrence’s encouragement of her own literary efforts, of their wandering together in the Kentish hill country, and of her first meeting with Jessie Chambers. “Lawrence’s ‘Princess’” continues the narrative of the triple friendship, carrying it to its sad ending, but with the focus on Jessie Chambers. Perceptively and sympathetically written, it throws a clarifying light on the psychology of Lawrence and presents with literary charm another human being—Jessie, the Miriam of Sons and Lovers. In combined narrative-critique method, Corke, in the essay “Concerning The White Peacock,” relates Lawrence’s problems in writing this novel and gives an analysis of its literary quality. Lawrence and Apocalypse is cast in the form of a “deferred conversation” in which Lawrence and Corke discuss his philosophical ideas as presented in his Apocalypse. Although the book was written to present Lawrence’s ideas, its significance reposes equally in Corke’s reaction to his thought. As a succinct statement of Lawrence’s teachings about the nature of humanity, it has unique value.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2022)
650 0 _aLawrence, D. H.-(David Herbert),-1885-1930.
650 7 _aLITERARY CRITICISM / General.
_2bisacsh
700 1 _aRoberts, Warren
_eautore
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.7560/732070
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781477300763
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781477300763/original
942 _cEB
999 _c218212
_d218212