000			04623nam a22004935i 4500
001			218423
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214234351.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220729t20221953txu fo d z eng d
020			_a9781477307199 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.7560/780279 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9781477307199
035			_a(DE-B1597)588671
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aKF1856
072		7	_aLAW000000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a333.1 _222
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aBartley, Ernest R. _eautore
245	1	4	_aThe Tidelands Oil Controversy : _bA Legal and Historical Analysis / _cErnest R. Bartley.
264		1	_aAustin : _bUniversity of Texas Press, _c[2022]
264		4	_c©1953
300			_a1 online resource (324 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tPreface -- _tContents -- _t1. The Problem -- _t2. The Territorial Concept of the Marginal Sea -- _t3. Claims of the Original States to Submerged Lands -- _t4. Claims of Later States to Submerged Lands -- _t5. California's Claims to Submerged Lands -- _t6. Texas' Claims to Submerged Lands -- _t7. Congressional Policy on Submerged Lands Prior to World War II -- _t8. Executive Policy on Submerged Lands Prior to United States v. California -- _t9. The Quitclaim Attempt in 1945 -- _t10. United States v. California -- _t11. The Immediate Aftermath of United States v. California -- _t12. United States v. Louisiana and United States v. Texas -- _t13. Quitclaim or Federal Control? -- _t14. The New Doctrine of Paramount Powers -- _t15. Conclusions -- _tAppendix -- _tTable of Cases -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aThis study is not written from the narrow perspective of “Who gets the oil?” It is a thoughtful probing of an issue—the ownership and control of the submerged soils of the marginal sea—the outcome of which may go far to determine the division of powers between states and nation under the American federal system. American constitutional law, international law, theory of federalism, American politics, the machinations of pressure groups, use of propaganda techniques, and issues of social and economic policy—all these features of American government and many more are inherent in the controversy. In 1947, in a precedent-making decision, the Supreme Court enunciated the principle that the federal government, not the states, has “paramount rights in and power over” the marginal seas which border the coastal states, and has “full dominion over the resources under that water area, including oil.” For more than 150 years the littoral states had exercised uncontested jurisdiction and ownership over the marginal-sea area, subject only to the powers specifically granted to the national government by the Constitution. The states had regulated the fisheries within the three-mile limit, applying state laws to vessels licensed under federal statutes. Long before oil possibilities were thought of, they had granted or leased areas in the marginal seas to private persons and corporations for purposes of land reclamation and harbor development, dredging for sand and gravel, development of oyster beds, and similar projects. These property rights can far exceed in value the wealth to be derived from petroleum. A just settlement of the issue, says the author, calls for restoration to the states of control of the marginal sea out to their historical boundaries—three miles in most cases; three leagues, or ten and one-half miles, in the case of Texas and the west coast of Florida. This study is based upon thorough investigation of all literature on the subject and personal interviews and correspondence with leaders on both sides of the controversy.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jul 2022)
650		0	_aPetroleum in submerged lands _zUnited States.
650		0	_aSubmerged lands _zUnited States.
650		7	_aLAW / General. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.7560/780279
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781477307199
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781477307199/original
942			_cEB
999			_c218423 _d218423