000			04216nam a22006015i 4500
001			218551
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214234356.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			220426t20212017txu fo d z eng d
010			_a2016054039
020			_a9781477313695 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.7560/313671 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9781477313695
035			_a(DE-B1597)587708
035			_a(OCoLC)1280944467
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050	0	0	_aF3429.1.M3 _bH35 2017
050		4	_aF3429.1.M3 _bH35 2017
072		7	_aHIS000000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a985/.37 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aCox Hall, Amy _eautore
245	1	0	_aFraming a Lost City : _bScience, Photography, and the Making of Machu Picchu / _cAmy Cox Hall.
264		1	_aAustin : _bUniversity of Texas Press, _c[2021]
264		4	_c©2017
300			_a1 online resource (267 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tList of Illustrations -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tA Note on the Text -- _tIntroduction: Seeing Science -- _tSight -- _t1. Epistolary Science -- _t2. Huaquero Vision -- _tCirculation -- _t3. Latin America as Laboratory -- _t4. Discovery Aesthetics -- _t5. Picturing the Miserable Indian for Science -- _tContests -- _t6. The Politics of Seeing -- _tConclusion: Artifact -- _tNotes -- _tReference List -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aWhen Hiram Bingham, a historian from Yale University, first saw Machu Picchu in 1911, it was a ruin obscured by overgrowth whose terraces were farmed a by few families. A century later, Machu Picchu is a UNESCO world heritage site visited by more than a million tourists annually. This remarkable transformation began with the photographs that accompanied Bingham’s article published in National Geographic magazine, which depicted Machu Picchu as a lost city discovered. Focusing on the practices, technologies, and materializations of Bingham’s three expeditions to Peru (1911, 1912, 1914–1915), this book makes a convincing case that visualization, particularly through the camera, played a decisive role in positioning Machu Picchu as both a scientific discovery and a Peruvian heritage site. Amy Cox Hall argues that while Bingham’s expeditions relied on the labor, knowledge, and support of Peruvian elites, intellectuals, and peasants, the practice of scientific witnessing, and photography specifically, converted Machu Picchu into a cultural artifact fashioned from a distinct way of seeing. Drawing on science and technology studies, she situates letter writing, artifact collecting, and photography as important expeditionary practices that helped shape the way we understand Machu Picchu today. Cox Hall also demonstrates that the photographic evidence was unstable, and, as images circulated worldwide, the “lost city” took on different meanings, especially in Peru, which came to view the site as one of national patrimony in need of protection from expeditions such as Bingham’s.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2022)
650		0	_aAnthropological ethics.
650		0	_aMachu Picchu Site (Peru).
650		0	_aPeru-Antiquities.
650		0	_aPeruvian Expeditions-(1912-1915).
650		0	_aPhotography _xMoral and ethical aspects _zPeru _zMachu Picchu Site.
650		0	_aPhotography-Moral and ethical aspects-Peru-Machu Picchu Site.
650		0	_aYale Peruvian Expedition-(1911).
650		0	_aYale Peruvian Expedition-(1912).
650		7	_aHISTORY / General. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.7560/313671
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781477313695
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781477313695/original
942			_cEB
999			_c218551 _d218551