| 000 | 03295nam a22004815i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 218711 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20230501182209.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 230127t20222020txu fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9781477321690 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.7560/321683 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781477321690 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)625670 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1343104722 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 072 | 7 |
_aHIS000000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a937/.05 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aTaylor, Michael J. _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSoldiers and Silver : _bMobilizing Resources in the Age of Roman Conquest / _cMichael J. Taylor. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aAustin : _bUniversity of Texas Press, _c[2022] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2020 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (256 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction -- _tPart I. Manpower -- _tChapter One Roman Manpower -- _tChapter Two Rival Manpower -- _tPart II. Finance -- _tChapter Three Roman Finance -- _tChapter Four Rival Finance -- _tConclusions -- _tAppendix: A Note on Ancient Demography -- _tNotes -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aBy the middle of the second century BCE, after nearly one hundred years of warfare, Rome had exerted its control over the entire Mediterranean world, forcing the other great powers of the region—Carthage, Macedonia, Egypt, and the Seleucid empire—to submit militarily and financially. But how, despite its relative poverty and its frequent numerical disadvantage in decisive battles, did Rome prevail? Michael J. Taylor explains this surprising outcome by examining the role that manpower and finances played, providing a comparative study that quantifies the military mobilizations and tax revenues for all five powers. Though Rome was the poorest state, it enjoyed the largest military mobilization, drawing from a pool of citizens, colonists, and allies, while its wealthiest adversaries failed to translate revenues into large or successful armies. Taylor concludes that state-level extraction strategies were decisive in the warfare of the period, as states with high conscription and low taxation raised larger, more successful armies than those that primarily sought to maximize taxation. Comprehensive and detailed, Soldiers and Silver offers a new and sophisticated perspective on the political dynamics and economies of these ancient Mediterranean empires. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 27. Jan 2023) | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aFinance, Public _zRome. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aHISTORY / General. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.7560/321683 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781477321690 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781477321690/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c218711 _d218711 |
||