| 000 | 03478nam a2200529Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 220541 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20231211164157.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 231101t19881988onc fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9781487581404 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781487582685 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.3138/9781487582685 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781487582685 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)527903 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1121056324 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aHD3860 _b.M334 1988 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aBUS079000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a346.023 _223 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aMcAfee, R. Preston _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aIncentives in Government Contracting / _cJohn McMillan, R. Preston McAfee. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aToronto : _bUniversity of Toronto Press, _c[1988] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©1988 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (184 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 | _aHeritage | |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aCould the existing level of government services by provided at a lower cost? This study presents a convincing argument for incentive contracts as a means to this end. In a typical market economy, payments from the government to firms account for about one-half of government spending (excluding transfer payments). By changing the way in which a government pays the firms from which it procures goods and services, it would be possible to maintain the existing array of government programs at a lower price. The major finding of this study is that governments could significantly reduce their expenditures by making extensive use of incentive contracts where they currently use either fixed-price contracts or cost-plus contracts. An incentive contract shares cost overruns and cost underruns between the government and the contractor according to a predetermined ratio. An incentive contract stimulates competition among the firms bidding for the contract and shares the project's risk between the government and the selected firm, while giving the contractor incentives to keep incurred costs low. In addition to advocating the use of incentive contracts, the study analyses the consequences of preferential treatment for domestic content over foreign content in government procurement, discusses the choice for a government agency between producing a commodity or service in-house and contracting for its provision with a private firm, and examines the experience with contracting of both the Ontario government and the United States Department of Defense in order to draw lessons for government contracting in general. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Nov 2023) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aGovernment purchasing. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aPublic contracts _zOntario. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aPublic contracts. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Government & Business. _2bisacsh |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMcMillan, John _eautore |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781487582685 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781487582685/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c220541 _d220541 |
||