000 03802nam a2200493Ia 4500
001 220635
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20231211164203.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 231101t19841984onc fo d z eng d
020 _a9781487582487
_qprint
020 _a9781487583903
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.3138/9781487583903
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781487583903
035 _a(DE-B1597)528017
035 _a(OCoLC)1129203176
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aHX39.5
_b.T447 2018
072 7 _aPOL005000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a335.4
_223
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aTeeple, Gary
_eautore
245 1 0 _aMarx's Critique of Politics 1842-1847 /
_cGary Teeple.
264 1 _aToronto :
_bUniversity of Toronto Press,
_c[1984]
264 4 _c©1984
300 _a1 online resource (322 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aHeritage
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aThe prevailing view of Marx's early writings suggests that they comprise a set of disconnected works which share only the same author, that Marx was philosophically an idealist or Hegelian and politically a 'liberal' or 'democrat' throughout much of this period, and that he possessed no particular method of inquiry. Professor Teeple challenges these ideas in his exposition of the development of Marx's critique of politics from the earliest published writings in 1842 to the end of this period in 1847. Eschewing the search for Marx's intellectual sources, and a narrow focus on any one of these early works, the author traces Marx's intellectual development through a careful analysis of the texts,. He demonstrates an unmistakable continuity throughout the period, arguing that Marx consciously worked out his critique of politics from a well-defined starting point in his doctoral dissertation and the Rheinische Zeitung articles to a logical conclusion in The German Ideology. Each stop in this development, it is argued, not only formed an integral link but also remained in Marx's eyes valid in itself. The basis of this continuity is seen to lie in the method Marx employed. The author contends that Marx did possess and apply a method in a conscious and consistent manner and that the method evolved concomitantly with his ever-deepening grasp of the nature of politics and its premises. Indeed, to discover the nature of this method and how it develops is to discover the implicit unity or rationality underlying Marx's early writings and to grasp fully their substance. In a word, Dr. Teeple argues that from a critique of politics at the level of politics to a critique of the premises of politics, Marx pursued in these early works what he considered to be a scientific understanding of the nature of human development. The thrust of the author's argument goes against the grain of accepted opinion, and for this reason alone the book will shed new light on Marx's widely discussed early writings and should generate considerable controversy.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Nov 2023)
650 0 _aPolitical science.
650 7 _aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / Communism, Post-Communism & Socialism.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781487583903
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781487583903/original
942 _cEB
999 _c220635
_d220635