000			03915nam a2200613Ia 4500
001			222431
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20250106150906.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			240426t20182001nyu fo d z eng d
020			_a9781501728242 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.7591/9781501728242 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9781501728242
035			_a(DE-B1597)514992
035			_a(OCoLC)1121056288
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aHD5660.U5 _bL644 2001eb
072		7	_aPOL013000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a658.3225 _222
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aLogue, John _eautore
245	1	4	_aThe Real World of Employee Ownership / _cJacquelyn Yates, John Logue.
264		1	_aIthaca, NY : _bCornell University Press, _c[2018]
264		4	_c©2001
300			_a1 online resource (264 p.) : _b20 charts, 30 tables
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tFigures -- _tTables -- _tForeword -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction: From Frontier Egalitarianism to Employee Ownership -- _t1. The Real World of Employee Ownership in Ohio -- _t2. Communication and Training: Building a Learning Environment -- _t3. Participation: Can Workers Run the Firm? -- _t4. Union Brothers and Sisters in the Boardroom? -- _t5. Do ESOPs Mature? Modeling Performance and Profits -- _t6. Employee Ownership and Public Policy -- _tAPPENDIX 1. About the Ohio Survey -- _tAPPENDIX 2. Results of the 1992-93 Ohio ESOP Survey -- _tNotes -- _tWorks Cited -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aUsing data from an extensive study of employee-owned companies in Ohio, where employee ownership is a well-developed trend, this book offers a strong empirical portrait of firms with Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs). It describes how these plans work and places their emergence and change in a historical context. John Logue and Jacquelyn Yates examine firms that have succeeded in employee ownership and those with failed plans. Some companies, they find, are committed to the concept of employee ownership, and others merely use ESOPs as a financing tool.Detailed information resulting from multiple surveys allows the authors to draw well-grounded conclusions regarding the question of why some employee-owned firms outperform others. The bottom line, they find, is that employee-owned firms that "do it all," implementing features such as employee participation and communication about finances, training, and cultural change, systematically outperform their conventional competitors. They also have an advantage over firms that understand employee ownership incompletely, if it all, and yet claim to adopt its methods.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2024)
650		0	_aEmployee ownership _zOhio _vCase studies.
650		0	_aEmployee ownership _zUnited States.
650		0	_aEmployee ownership.
650		0	_aStock ownership _zUnited States.
650		4	_aGeneral Economics.
650		4	_aLabor History.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Labor & Industrial Relations. _2bisacsh
700	1		_aCross, Heather _eautore
700	1		_aGreider, William _eautore
700	1		_aMaxwell, Jennifer _eautore
700	1		_aThomas, Karen _eautore
700	1		_aYates, Jacquelyn _eautore
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.7591/9781501728242
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781501728242
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781501728242/original
942			_cEB
999			_c222431 _d222431