000			04153nam a2200529Ia 4500
001			222437
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20250106150907.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			240426t20182007nyu fo d z eng d
020			_a9781501728310 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.7591/9781501728310 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9781501728310
035			_a(DE-B1597)515443
035			_a(OCoLC)1100436452
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050		4	_aJZ5584.U6 _bL96 1999eb
072		7	_aPOL034000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a327.1/72/0973 _223
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aLynch, Cecelia M. _eautore
245	1	0	_aBeyond Appeasement : _bInterpreting Interwar Peace Movements in World Politics / _cCecelia M. Lynch.
264		1	_aIthaca, NY : _bCornell University Press, _c[2018]
264		4	_c©2007
300			_a1 online resource (256 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction: Mythological Narratives and Critical Interpretation -- _t1. An Interpretivist Approach to Social Movements and the Interwar Peace Movements -- _t2. The Evolution of U.S. and British Peace Movements since 1815 -- _t3. Reinterpreting the British Peace Movement in the 1920s -- _t4. Normative Struggle and the British Peace Movement in the 1930s -- _t5. Reinterpreting the U.S. Peace Movement in the 1920s -- _t6. The U.S. Peace Movement and Internationalism in the 1930s -- _t7. Peace Movements and the Construction of the United Nations -- _tConclusion: Social Movements, Narratives, and Critical Analysis -- _tArchives and Private Papers -- _tIndex
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aThe interwar peace movements were, according to conventional interpretations, naive and ineffective. More seriously, the standard histories have also held that they severely weakened national efforts to resist Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia. Cecelia Lynch provides a long-overdue reevaluation of these movements. Throughout the work she challenges these interpretations, particularly regarding the postwar understanding of Realism, which forms the basis of core assumptions in international relations theory.The Realist account labels support for interwar peace movements as idealist. It holds that this support—largely pacifist in Britain, largely isolationist in the United States—led to overreliance on the League of Nations, appeasement, and eventually the onset of global war. Through a careful examination of both the social history of the peace movements and the diplomatic history of the interwar era, Lynch uncovers the serious contradictions as well as the systematic limitations of Realist understanding and outlines the making of the structure of the world community that would emerge from the war.Lynch focuses on the construction of the United Nations as evidence that the conventional history is incomplete as well as misleading. She brings to light the role of social movements in the formation of the normative underpinnings of the U.N., thus requiring scholars to rethink their understanding of the repercussions of the interwar experience as well as the significance of social movements for international life.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2024)
650		0	_aPeace movements _zGreat Britain _xHistory.
650		0	_aPeace movements _zUnited States _xHistory.
650		4	_aHistory.
650		4	_aPolitical Science & Political History.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Peace. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.7591/9781501728310
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781501728310
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781501728310/original
942			_cEB
999			_c222437 _d222437