000 04509nam a22006855i 4500
001 222860
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20221214234648.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 220302t20191992nyu fo d z eng d
020 _a9781501735028
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.7591/9781501735028
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781501735028
035 _a(DE-B1597)534605
035 _a(OCoLC)1143813503
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
072 7 _aPHI034000
_2bisacsh
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aHiley, David
_eautore
245 1 4 _aThe Interpretive Turn :
_bPhilosophy, Science, Culture /
_cJames Bohman, David Hiley, Richard Shusterman.
264 1 _aIthaca, NY :
_bCornell University Press,
_c[2019]
264 4 _c©1992
300 _a1 online resource (328 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tPreface --
_tIntroduction: The Interpretive Turn --
_tPART ONE. THE INTERPRETIVE TURN IN THE NATURAL AND HUMAN SCIENCES --
_t1. The Natural and the Human Sciences --
_t2. Heidegger's Hermeneutic Realism --
_t3. Interpretation in Natural and Human Science --
_tPART TWO. INTERPRETATION AND EPISTEMOLOGY --
_t4. Inquiry as Recontextualization: An Anti-Dualist Account of Interpretation --
_t5. Pragmatism or Hermeneutics? Epistemology after Foundationalism --
_t6. Beneath Interpretation --
_t7. Holism without Skepticism: Contextualism and the Limits of Interpretation --
_t8. Is Hermeneutics Ethnocentric? --
_tPART THREE. INTERPRETATION --
_t9. Interpretation as Explanation --
_t10. True Figures: Metaphor, Social Relations, and the Sorites --
_t11. Rhetoric in Postmodern Feminism: Put-Offs, Put-Ons, and Political Plays --
_t12. Constitutional Hermeneutics --
_t13. Serious Watching --
_t14. Hermeneutics and Genre: Bakhtin and the Problem of Communicative Interaction --
_t15. The Dialogical Self --
_tContributors --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aThis wide-ranging and provocative book responds to a debate that is radically changing the relationships between the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Many now agree that foundationalism in philosophy and positivism in science have been overturned, and that philosophy, having found that its "linguistic turn" led to a dead end, must now take an "interpretive turn." In philosophy, the sciences, and such diverse fields as anthropology, law, and social history, the turn to interpretation has challenged many fundamental assumptions, forcing scholars to contest the status of knowledge claims. Are interpretations true? Is interpretation universal? How can interpretive claims be justified rationally? Fifteen new essays representing both preeminent thinkers in these debates and notable younger scholars here explore such questions. Individual essays address aspects of the relationship between the human and the natural sciences, epistemological and normative issues in interpretation, and key topics in a variety of disciplines.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 02. Mrz 2022)
650 4 _aGeneral Science.
650 4 _aPhilosophy.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / Social.
_2bisacsh
700 1 _aBohman, James
_eautore
700 1 _aBohman, James F.
_eautore
700 1 _aBuker, Eloise A.
_eautore
700 1 _aDreyfus, Hubert L.
_eautore
700 1 _aGuignon, Charles B.
_eautore
700 1 _aHiley, David R.
_eautore
700 1 _aHoy, David Couzens
_eautore
700 1 _aKent, Thomas
_eautore
700 1 _aKuhn, Thomas S.
_eautore
700 1 _aNehamas, Alexander
_eautore
700 1 _aRorty, Richard
_eautore
700 1 _aRoth, Paul A.
_eautore
700 1 _aRouse, Joseph
_eautore
700 1 _aShusterman, Richard
_eautore
700 1 _aTaylor, Charles
_eautore
700 1 _aValauri, John T.
_eautore
700 1 _aWheeler, Samuel C.
_eautore
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.7591/9781501735028
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781501735028
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781501735028/original
942 _cEB
999 _c222860
_d222860