000 04186nam a2200541Ia 4500
001 222904
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20250106150921.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 240426t20182010nyu fo d z eng d
020 _a9781501735936
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.7591/9781501735936
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9781501735936
035 _a(DE-B1597)514877
035 _a(OCoLC)1083621091
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
072 7 _aPOL011000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a363.72/87/091724
_223
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aClapp, Jennifer
_eautore
245 1 0 _aToxic Exports :
_bThe Transfer of Hazardous Wastes from Rich to Poor Countries /
_cJennifer Clapp.
264 1 _aIthaca, NY :
_bCornell University Press,
_c[2018]
264 4 _c©2010
300 _a1 online resource (192 p.) :
_b5 tables
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tPreface --
_tAcronyms --
_t1. Hazard Transfer from Rich to Poor Countries --
_t2. The Hazardous Waste Trade and International Regulatory Measures --
_t3. The Role of Environmental NGOs in the Evolution of the Basel Ban --
_t4. Industry Players and Post-Basel Ban Amendment Politics --
_t5. Foreign Direct Investment in Hazardous Industries --
_t6. Market-Based and Voluntary Initiatives: Promoting Clean Productiont --
_t7. Conclusion: Prospects for Clean Production on a Global Scale --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aIn recent years, international trade in toxic waste and hazardous technologies by firms in rich industrialized countries has emerged as a routine practice. Many poor countries have accepted these deadly imports but are ill equipped to manage the materials safely. For more than a decade, environmentalists and the governments of developing countries have lobbied intensively and generated public outcry in an attempt to halt hazardous transfers from Northern industrialized nations to the Third World, but the practice continues. In her insightful and important book, Jennifer Clapp addresses this alarming problem.Clapp describes the responses of those engaged in hazard transfer to international regulations, and in particular to the 1989 adoption of the Basel Convention. She pinpoints a key weakness of the regulations—because hazard transfer is dynamic, efforts to stop one form of toxic export prompt new forms to emerge. For instance, laws intended to ban the disposal of toxic wastes in the Third World led corporations to ship these byproducts to poor countries for "recycling." And, Clapp warns, current efforts to prohibit this "recycling movement" may accelerate a new business endeavor: the relocation to poor countries of entire industries that generate toxic wastes. Clapp concludes that the dynamic nature of hazard transfer results from increasingly fluid global trade and investment relations in the context of a highly unequal world, and from the leading role played by multinational corporations and environmental NGOs. Governments, she maintains, have for too long failed to capture the initiative and have instead only reacted to these opposing forces.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 26. Apr 2024)
650 0 _aGlobalization.
650 0 _aHazardous wastes
_xTransportation.
650 0 _aHazardous wastes
_zDeveloping countries.
650 4 _aInternational Studies.
650 4 _aLegal History & Studies.
650 4 _aPolitical Science & Political History.
650 7 _aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / General.
_2bisacsh
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.7591/9781501735936
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781501735936
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781501735936/original
942 _cEB
999 _c222904
_d222904