| 000 | 03476nam a2200529 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 227473 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20250106151021.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 240625t20032003nyu fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9781571814241 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9781782386063 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9781782386063 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9781782386063 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)636718 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)880437902 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aK487.A57 D66 2005 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aSOC019000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a340.115 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aDonovan, James M. _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAnthropology and Law / _cH. Edwin Anderson III, James M. Donovan. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aNew York ; _aOxford : _bBerghahn Books, _c[2003] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2003 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (246 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aAnthropology & . ; _v1 |
|
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tContents -- _tPreface to the Paperback Edition -- _tPreface to the First Edition -- _tIntroduction. The Thesis of Balanced Reciprocity -- _tChapter One. Practical Benefits of Anthropology to Law -- _tChapter Two. Practical Benefits of Law to Anthropology -- _tChapter Three. Theoretical Benefits of Anthropology to Law -- _tChapter Four. Theoretical Benefits of Law to Anthropology -- _tConclusion. Outlook and Recommendations -- _tSelected Bibliography -- _tIndex |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aThe relationship between Law and Anthropology can be considered as having been particularly intimate. In this book the authors defend their assertion that the two fields co-exist in a condition of "balanced reciprocity" wherein each makes important contributions to the successful practice and theory of the other. Anthropology, for example, offers a cross-culturally validated generic concept of "law," and clarifies other important legal concepts such as "religion" and "human rights." Law similarly illuminates key anthropological ideas such as the "social contract," and provides a uniquely valuable access point for the analysis of sociocultural systems. Legal practice renders a further important benefit to anthropology when it validates anthropological knowledge through the use of anthropologists as expert witnesses in the courtroom and the introduction of the "culture defense" against criminal charges. Although the actual relationship between anthropology and law today falls short of this idealized state of balanced reciprocity, the authors include historical and other data suggesting that that level of intimate cooperation draws ever closer. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 25. Jun 2024) | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aSOCIAL SCIENCE / Methodology. _2bisacsh |
|
| 653 | _aTheory and Methodology, Sociology. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aIII, H. Edwin Anderson _eautore |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9781782386063 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781782386063 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781782386063/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c227473 _d227473 |
||