000			04009nam a22006015i 4500
001			234610
003			IT-RoAPU
005			20221214235441.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr || ||||||||
008			211129t20142014gw fo d z eng d
010			_a2014427617
019			_a(OCoLC)903969990
020			_a9783110248029 _qprint
020			_a9783110391701 _qEPUB
020			_a9783110248036 _qPDF
024	7		_a10.1515/9783110248036 _2doi
035			_a(DE-B1597)9783110248036
035			_a(DE-B1597)114006
035			_a(OCoLC)883287982
040			_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda
050	0	0	_aKJC5132 _b.V359 2014
050		4	_aKJC5132
072		7	_aLAW018000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_81u _a341.26 _qDE-101 _222/ger
084			_aonline - DeGruyter
100	1		_aWalt, Johan van der _eautore
245	1	4	_aThe Horizontal Effect Revolution and the Question of Sovereignty / _cJohan van der Walt.
264		1	_aBerlin ; _aBoston : _bDe Gruyter, _c[2014]
264		4	_c©2014
300			_a1 online resource (428 p.)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0	0	_tFrontmatter -- _tPreface -- _tContents -- _tAcknowledgements and Disclaimers -- _tIntroduction -- _tPart One: Horizontal Effect -- _tChapter One: Erased Baselines and Inversed Coordinates: 19th Century Backgrounds of the Horizontality Question -- _tChapter Two: Twelve Pivotal Cases -- _tChapter Three: State Action -- _tChapter Four: Drittwirkung -- _tPart Two: Sovereignty -- _tChapter Five: Uninterrupted Sovereignty -- _tChapter Six: Différantial Sovereignty -- _tChapter Seven: Sovereignty and the Dual Destiny of Lüth in Europe -- _tChapter Eight: Liberal Democratic Constitutional Review -- _tBibliography -- _tAbbreviations -- _tIndex of Persons -- _tSubject Index
506	0		_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star
520			_aThat the recent turn in European Constitutional Review has effectively brought about a revolution in European law has been observed before. At issue are two major developments in European judicial review. On the one hand, the European Court of Human Rights has been collapsing traditional boundaries between constitutional law and private law with a series of decisions that effectively recognized the "horizontal" effect of Convention rights in the private sphere. On the other hand, the European Court of Justice has also given horizontal effect to fundamental liberties embodied in the Treaty on the Function of the European Union in a number of recent cases in a way that puts "established" boundaries between Member State and Union competences in question. This book takes issue with these developments by bringing to the fore a key issue that the horizontality effect debate has hitherto largely overlooked, namely, the question of sovereignty. It shows with detailed references to especially the American debate on state action and the German debate on Drittwirkung that horizontal effect cannot be understood consistently without coming to grips with the conceptions of state sovereignty that inform different approaches to horizontal effect.
538			_aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021)
650		0	_aCivil rights _zEurope.
650		0	_aInternational and municipal law _zEurope.
650		0	_aJudicial review _zEurope.
650		0	_aLaw _zEurope _xAmerican influences.
650		4	_aVerfassungsrecht.
650		7	_aLAW / Constitutional. _2bisacsh
850			_aIT-RoAPU
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110248036
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110248036
856	4	2	_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110248036/original
942			_cEB
999			_c234610 _d234610