000 03925nam a22006855i 4500
001 235611
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20230501182751.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 230228t20122013gw fo d z eng d
019 _a(OCoLC)994559050
020 _a9783110287653
_qprint
020 _a9783110289879
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9783110289879
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9783110289879
035 _a(DE-B1597)177218
035 _a(OCoLC)890043196
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aB439
_b.N67 2013
072 7 _aLIT004190
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a160
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aNoriega-Olmos, Simon
_eautore
245 1 0 _aAristotle's Psychology of Signification :
_bA Commentary on "De Interpretatione" 16a 3-18 /
_cSimon Noriega-Olmos.
264 1 _aBerlin ;
_aBoston :
_bDe Gruyter,
_c[2012]
264 4 _c©2013
300 _a1 online resource (185 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aBeiträge zur Altertumskunde ,
_x1616-0452 ;
_v303
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tPreface --
_tContents --
_tIntroduction --
_t1 Φωνή --
_t2 Σημεῖον --
_t3 The Significatum --
_t4 Νοήματα in De Interpretatione and De Anima, a New Interpretation of De Interpretatione 16a3–8 --
_t5 Κατὰ Συνθήκην --
_tConcluding Remarks --
_tBibliography --
_tName index
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aThis book reconstructs the theory of signification implicit in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione and its psychological background in his writing De Anima, a project often envisioned by scholars but never systematically undertaken. I begin by explaining what sort of phonetic material, according to Aristotle, can be a significans and a phônê. To that end, I provide a physiological account of which animal sounds count as phônê, as well as a psychological evaluation of the cognitive content of the phônai under consideration in De Interpretatione: names, verbs, and assertive sentences. I then turn to noêmata, which, for Aristotle, are the psychological reference and significata of names, verbs and assertive sentences. I explain what, for Aristotle, are the logical properties a significatum must have in order to be signified by the phonetic material of a name, verb or assertive sentence, and why noêmata can fulfil those logical conditions. Finally, I elucidate the significans-significatum relation without making use of the modern semantic triangle. This approach is consonant with Aristotle’s methodology and breaks new ground by exploring the connection between the linguistic and psychological aspects of Aristotle’s theory of signification.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023)
650 0 _aGreek literature
_xHistory and criticism.
650 0 _aPsychology in literature.
650 0 _aSignification (Logic) in literature.
650 4 _aAristoteles.
650 4 _aDe Interpretatione.
650 4 _aPsychologie.
650 4 _aSinn.
650 4 _aSprache.
650 7 _aLITERARY CRITICISM / Ancient & Classical.
_2bisacsh
653 _aAristotle.
653 _aDe Interpretatione.
653 _aLanguage.
653 _aPsychology.
653 _aSignification.
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289879
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110289879
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110289879/original
942 _cEB
999 _c235611
_d235611