| 000 | 03201nam a22005415i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 236469 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20230501182822.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 230228t20132010gw fo d z eng d | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)853251099 | ||
| 020 |
_a9783110324983 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9783110325546 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9783110325546 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9783110325546 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)211429 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)851970823 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aB105.I56 _bN64 2010eb |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI009000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aKosowski, Lukasz _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aNoema and Thinkability : _bAn Essay on Husserl's Theory of Intentionality / _cLukasz Kosowski. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aBerlin ; _aBoston : _bDe Gruyter, _c[2013] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2010 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (204 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aPhenomenology & Mind , _x2198-2058 ; _v13 |
|
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tTABLE OF CONTENTS -- _tABBREVIATIONS -- _tACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- _tINTRODUCTION -- _tChapter I. Foundations of phenomenology -- _tChapter II. Noema and noetic-noematic correlation in Ideas I -- _tChapter III. Interpretations and extensions of Husserl’s concept of noema -- _tChapter IV. The noema as possibly thinkable content -- _tSUMMARY -- _tBIBLIOGRAPHY -- _tINDEX -- _tBackmatter |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aThe years of study on Husserl’s theory of intentionality have led to a number of non-equivalent interpretations. The present work attempts to investigate the most prominent of these by presenting both their advantages and difficulties. However, its key point is specifically the analysis of Husserl’s theory. This is made in several stages that are concerned with the relation between noesis and noema: whether it is one-to-one or many-to-one, the kind of transcendency and dependency between them, and whether noema supervenes on noesis. Moreover, Husserl’s theory is also examined in-usually ignored-instances of contradiction, nonsense and intentional conflict. The outcome is a fresh reading in which noema occurs as the possibly thinkable content capable of constituting multi-objective references and composed of pure X explained in terms of syntactic matter and form. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aIntentionality (Philosophy). | |
| 650 | 4 | _aHusserl. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110325546 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110325546 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110325546/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c236469 _d236469 |
||