000 04121nam a22006975i 4500
001 236532
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20230501182824.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 230228t20132005gw fo d z eng d
019 _a(OCoLC)853241483
020 _a9783110327274
_qprint
020 _a9783110327519
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9783110327519
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9783110327519
035 _a(DE-B1597)211678
035 _a(OCoLC)852655792
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 4 _aBD238.F68
072 7 _aPHI000000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _81p
_a100
_qDE-101
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
245 0 0 _aBasic Belief and Basic Knowledge :
_bPapers in Epistemology /
_ced. by René Woudenberg, Sabine Roeser, Ron Rood.
264 1 _aBerlin ;
_aBoston :
_bDe Gruyter,
_c[2013]
264 4 _c©2005
300 _a1 online resource (300 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aPhilosophische Forschung / Philosophical Research ,
_x2198-2171 ;
_v4
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tTable of Contents --
_tIntroduction --
_tPart I: Basic Belief and Basic Knowledge General Issues --
_tIntuitive Knowledge Reconsidered --
_tFoundationalism Strikes Back? In Search of Epistemically Basic Mental States --
_tBasic Beliefs, Coherence, and Bootstrap Confirmation --
_tPart II Areas of Basic Belief and Basic Knowledge --
_tA: Mathematics and Philosophy --
_tOn the status of axioms in mathematics --
_tMathematical Knowledge. A Defence of Modest and Sober Platonism --
_tA Trilemma for Philosophical Knowledge --
_tB: Religious Belief --
_tDefeaters and the Basicality of Theistic Belief --
_tReforming Reformed Epistemology --
_tWhy basic theistic belief is probably not warranted, even if it is true --
_tC: Morals, Testimony, and Proprioception --
_tDefending Moral Intuition --
_tBasic Beliefs, Testimony, and Blind-Trust --
_tProprioception as Basic Knowledge of the Body --
_tAbout the Authors --
_tBackmatter
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aOver the last two decades foundationalism has been severely criticized. In response to this various alternatives to it have been advanced, notably coherentism. At the same time new versions of foundationalism were crafted, that were claimed to be immune to the earlier criticisms. This volume contains 12 papers in which various aspects of this dialectic are covered. A number of papers continue the trend to defend foundationalism, and foundationalism's commitment to basic beliefs and basic knowledge, against various attacks. Others aim to show that one important objection against coherentism, viz. that the notion of 'coherence' is too vague to be useful, can be countered.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023)
650 0 _aFoundationalism (Theory of knowledge)
_vCongresses.
650 4 _aErkenntnistheorie.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / General.
_2bisacsh
700 1 _aDouven, Igor
_eautore
700 1 _aEng, David
_eautore
700 1 _aHale, Bob
_eautore
700 1 _aHales, Steven D.
_eautore
700 1 _aHamilton, Andy
_eautore
700 1 _aMiller, Christian B.
_eautore
700 1 _aNanay, Bence
_eautore
700 1 _aPritchard, Duncan
_eautore
700 1 _aRoeser, Sabine
_eautore
_ecuratore
700 1 _aRood, Ron
_eautore
_ecuratore
700 1 _aWeidemann, Christian
_eautore
700 1 _aWoudenberg, René
_ecuratore
700 1 _aWoudenberg, René van
_eautore
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110327519
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110327519
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110327519/original
942 _cEB
999 _c236532
_d236532