000 04579nam a2200745 454500
001 237710
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20250106151305.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 240625t20162016gw fo d z eng d
019 _a(OCoLC)955230564
020 _a9783110374728
_qprint
020 _a9783110402117
_qEPUB
020 _a9783110402001
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9783110402001
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9783110402001
035 _a(DE-B1597)443723
035 _a(OCoLC)973401222
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
072 7 _aLAN009000
_2bisacsh
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
245 0 0 _aSubjective Meaning :
_bAlternatives to Relativism /
_ced. by Cécile Meier, Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink.
264 1 _aBerlin ;
_aBoston :
_bDe Gruyter,
_c[2016]
264 4 _c©2016
300 _a1 online resource (IX, 250 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aLinguistische Arbeiten ,
_x0344-6727 ;
_v559
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tPreface --
_tSubjective meaning: An introduction --
_tIf expressivism is fun, go for it! --
_tDoing without judge dependence --
_tPredicates of personal taste and the evidential step --
_tContextualism and disagreement about taste --
_tTwo kinds of subjectivity --
_tEvaluative propositions and subjective judgments --
_tPredicates of experience --
_tPropositions and implicit arguments carry a default general point of view --
_tSubjective meaning and modality --
_tIndex
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aA dish may be delicious, a painting beautiful, a piece of information justified. Whether the attributed properties "really" hold, seems to depend on somebody like a speaker or a group of people that share standards and background. Relativists and contextualists differ in where they locate the dependency theoretically. This book collects papers that corroborate the contextualist view that the dependency is part of the language.
520 _aThis volume contributes to the debate on relativism vs. contextualism. It comprises a collection of papers that take the problem of “faultless disagreement” as their starting point. The contributors all criticize the relativist view that the variability in subjective judgments necessitates the variability of the notion of truth dependent on a judge or assessor. They investigate the problem of faultless disagreement by investigating differences and similarities between subjective judgments with epistemic modals on the one hand and predicates of personal taste on the other. Importantly, they also draw on data beyond taste and knowledge, including data from language acquisition. The theoretical analyses are quite diverse. But all proposals are compatible with the contextualist view – that the variability in subjective judgments is an effect of how the meaning of an expression is understood. The volume is relevant for linguists and philosophers of language interested in the problem of faultless disagreement and the semantics and pragmatics of modals and adjectives.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 25. Jun 2024)
650 4 _aBeurteilung.
650 4 _aModalverben.
650 4 _aSemantik.
650 7 _aLANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General.
_2bisacsh
653 _aJudgement.
653 _aModal Verbs.
653 _aSemantics.
700 1 _aCarlson, Gregory
_eautore
700 1 _aGunlogson, Christine
_eautore
700 1 _aGutzmann, Daniel
_eautore
700 1 _aHegarty, Michael
_eautore
700 1 _aHirvonen, Sanna
_eautore
700 1 _aKennedy, Christopher
_eautore
700 1 _aMeier, Cécile
_ecuratore
700 1 _aRoeper, Tom
_eautore
700 1 _aUmbach, Carla
_eautore
700 1 _aWijnbergen-Huitink, Janneke van
_eautore
700 1 _aWolf, Lavi
_eautore
700 1 _aZeman, Dan
_eautore
700 1 _avan Wijnbergen-Huitink, Janneke
_ecuratore
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110402001
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110402001
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110402001/original
942 _cEB
999 _c237710
_d237710