000 03830nam a22006375i 4500
001 239674
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20230501183017.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 230228t20172017gw fo d z eng d
020 _a9783110519419
_qprint
020 _a9783110524659
_qEPUB
020 _a9783110525458
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9783110525458
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9783110525458
035 _a(DE-B1597)474451
035 _a(OCoLC)992471877
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
072 7 _aPHI004000
_2bisacsh
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aKuenzle, Dominique
_eautore
245 1 0 _aRefurbishing Epistemology :
_bA Meta-Epistemological Framework /
_cDominique Kuenzle.
264 1 _aBerlin ;
_aBoston :
_bDe Gruyter,
_c[2017]
264 4 _c©2017
300 _a1 online resource (VIII, 256 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aEpistemic Studies : Philosophy of Science, Cognition and Mind ,
_x2512-5168 ;
_v35
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tAcknowledgements --
_tContents --
_tIntroduction: Retooling the Epistemic Workshop --
_t1. Towards a New Meta-Epistemology --
_t2. What Is “Meta-Epistemology”? --
_t3. Epistemic States and Performances --
_t4. Varieties of Norm-Talk --
_t5. Epistemic Evaluations and Concepts --
_tConclusion --
_tBibliography --
_tAuthor Index --
_tSubject Index
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aEven though important developments within 20th and 21st century philosophy have widened the scope of epistemology, this has not yet resulted in a systematic meta-epistemological debate about epistemology’s aims, methods, and criteria of success. Ideas such as the methodology of reflective equilibrium, the proposal to "naturalize" epistemology, constructivist impulses fuelling the "sociology of scientific knowledge", pragmatist calls for taking into account the practical point of epistemic evaluations, as well as feminist criticism of the abstract and individualist assumptions built into traditional epistemology are widely discussed, but they have not typically resulted in the call for, let alone the construction of, a suitable meta-epistemological framework.This book motivates and elaborates such a new meta-epistemology. It provides a pragmatist, social and functionalist account of epistemic states that offers the conceptual space for revised or even replaced epistemic concepts. This is what it means to "refurbish epistemology": The book assesses conceptual tools in relation to epistemology’s functionally defined conceptual space, responsive to both intra-epistemic considerations and political and moral values.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023)
650 0 _aKnowledge, Theory of.
650 4 _aFeministische Epistemologie.
650 4 _aFunktionalismus.
650 4 _aKuhn, Thomas S.
650 4 _aNormativität.
650 4 _aSoziale Epistemologie.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / Epistemology.
_2bisacsh
653 _aSocial epistemology.
653 _aThomas S. Kuhn.
653 _afeminist epistemology.
653 _afunctionalism.
653 _anormativity.
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110525458
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110525458
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110525458/original
942 _cEB
999 _c239674
_d239674