000 04519nam a22006495i 4500
001 240367
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20230501183043.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 230228t20182018gw fo d z eng d
010 _a2018009488
020 _a9783110573961
_qprint
020 _a9783110574036
_qEPUB
020 _a9783110576399
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9783110576399
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9783110576399
035 _a(DE-B1597)489282
035 _a(OCoLC)1046610051
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
050 0 0 _aCB361
_b.M28 2018
050 4 _aCB361
072 7 _aHIS037020
_2bisacsh
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aMaissen, Thomas
_eautore
245 1 0 _aWhy China did not have a Renaissance – and why that matters :
_bAn interdisciplinary Dialogue /
_cThomas Maissen, Barbara Mittler.
264 1 _aMünchen ;
_aWien :
_bDe Gruyter Oldenbourg,
_c[2018]
264 4 _c©2018
300 _a1 online resource (XVII, 238 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aCritical Readings in Global Intellectual History ,
_x2568-843X ;
_v1
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tContents --
_tList of illustrations --
_tSeries editors’ note --
_tPrologue --
_tPeriodization in a global context --
_tIntroduction --
_tEpochal changes in a global context – Toward a History-in-common --
_tDefining epochs in global history – Can we write a History-in-common without shared concepts? --
_tPart I. Periodization --
_tEurope: Secularizing teleological models --
_tChina: Engendering teleological models --
_tPart II .Renaissances --
_tThe view from Europe: The Renaissance --
_tThe view from China: r/Renaissances --
_tConclusion --
_tThe Renaissance and the rise of the West --
_tRenaissance-in-common? History-as-dialogue --
_tEpilogue --
_tWhy China did not have a Renaissance – and why that matters: Conflicting approaches to periodization --
_tAppendix --
_tSources from the European Renaissance --
_tSources from the Chinese Renaissance --
_tAcknowledgements --
_tWorks cited --
_tIndex of names and places
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aConcepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have existed in many civilizations. In spite of claims that they be transnational or even universal, periodization schemes invariably reveal specific social and cultural predispositions.Our dialogue, which brings together a Sinologist and a scholar of early modern History in Europe, considers periodization as a historical phenomenon, studying the case of the “Renaissance.” Understood in the tradition of J. Burckhardt, who referred back to ideas voiced by the humanists of the 14th and 15th centuries, and focusing on the particularities of humanist dialogue which informed the making of the “Renaissance” in Italy, our discussion highlights elements that distinguish it from other movements that have proclaimed themselves as “r/Renaissances,” studying, in particular, the Chinese Renaissance in the early 20th century.While disagreeing on several fundamental issues, we suggest that interdisciplinary and interregional dialogue is a format useful to addressing some of the more far-reaching questions in global history, e.g. whether and when a periodization scheme such as “Renaissance” can fruitfully be applied to describe non-European experiences.
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023)
650 0 _aCHINA--HISTORY--MING DYNASTY, 1368-1644.
650 0 _aCHINA.
650 0 _aRENAISSANCE.
650 0 _aRenaissance.
650 7 _aHISTORY / Renaissance.
_2bisacsh
700 1 _aBanerjee, Milinda
_eautore
700 1 _aMaissen, Thomas
_eautore
700 1 _aMeurer, Sebastian
_eautore
700 1 _aMittler, Barbara
_eautore
700 1 _aRichter, Susan
_eautore
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110576399
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110576399
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110576399/original
942 _cEB
999 _c240367
_d240367