| 000 | 03478nam a22005535i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 242403 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20230501183208.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 230228t20202021gw fo d z eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9783110705713 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9783110705898 _qEPUB |
||
| 020 |
_a9783110705829 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9783110705829 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9783110705829 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)551136 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1206402284 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aThomassen, Einar _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe Coherence of “Gnosticism” / _cEinar Thomassen. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aBerlin ; _aBoston : _bDe Gruyter, _c[2020] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2021 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (XIV, 39 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aHans-Lietzmann-Vorlesungen , _x1861-6011 ; _v18 |
|
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tFrontmatter -- _tPreface -- _tTable of Contents -- _t1 Is it still possible to speak about “Gnosticism”? -- _t2 Reconstructing coherence -- _t3 Valentinus and “the Gnostic sect” -- _t4 Irenaeus, Haer. 1.29 and the Apocryphon of John -- _t5 The mythological system of Irenaeus, Haer. 1.29 -- _t6 The protologies of Haer. 1.29 and 1.30 compared -- _t7 The Valentinian reception of Gnostic protology -- _t8 The underlying logic of Gnostic protology -- _t9 Conclusion -- _tBibliography |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _a“Gnosticism” has become a problematic category in the study of early Christianity. It obscures diversity, invites essentialist generalisations, and is a legacy of ancient heresiology. However, simply to conclude with “diversity” is unsatisfying, and new efforts to discern coherence and to synthesise need to be made. The present work seeks to make a fresh start by concentrating on Irenaeus’ report on a specific group called the “Gnostics” and on his claim that Valentinus and his followers were inspired by their ideas. Following this lead, an attempt is made to trace the continuity of ideas from this group to Valentinianism. The study concludes that there is more continuity than has previously been recognised. Irenaeus’ “Gnostics” emerge as the predecessors not only of Valentinianism, but also of Sethianism. They represent an early, philosophically inspired form of Christ religion that arose independently of the New Testament canon. Christology is essential and provides the basis for the myth of Sophia. The book is relevant for all students of Christian origins and the early history of the Church. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 28. Feb 2023) | |
| 650 | 4 | _aGnosis. | |
| 650 | 4 | _aIrenäus von Lyon. | |
| 650 | 4 | _aPlatonismus. | |
| 653 | _aGnosticism. | ||
| 653 | _aIrenaeus. | ||
| 653 | _aPlatonism. | ||
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110705829 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110705829 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110705829/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c242403 _d242403 |
||