| 000 | 03119nam a22005655i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 249529 | ||
| 003 | IT-RoAPU | ||
| 005 | 20221215000433.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
| 008 | 220629t20112005gw fo d z ger d | ||
| 019 | _a(OCoLC)1013963456 | ||
| 020 |
_a9783899492170 _qprint |
||
| 020 |
_a9783110895483 _qPDF |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9783110895483 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)9783110895483 | ||
| 035 | _a(DE-B1597)56660 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)840438754 | ||
| 040 |
_aDE-B1597 _beng _cDE-B1597 _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aJC11 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW075000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_81p _a340 _a320 |
| 084 | _aonline - DeGruyter | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aPeukert, Helge _eautore |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aDas tradierte Konzept der Staatswissenschaft / _cHelge Peukert. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aBerlin ; _aBoston : _bDe Gruyter, _c[2011] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2005 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (50 p.) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
| 490 | 0 |
_aErfurter Beiträge zu den Staatswissenschaften ; _v4 |
|
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_ti-iv -- _tDas tradierte Konzept der Staatswissenschaft -- _t1. Ein Versuch der Begriffsbestimmung und der Stand der Literatur -- _t2. Ein kurzer historischer Überblick -- _t3. Eine methodologische Hypothese -- _t4. Schlözers Enzyklopädie und Metapolitik der Staatswissenschaften (1793) -- _t5. Johann Heinrich Jungs Lehrbuch der Staats-Polizey-Wissenschaft (1788) -- _t6. Mohl und die Ausdifferenzierung der Gesellschafts- und Staatswissenschaft (1851) -- _t7. Steins System der Staatswissenschaft (1852 und 1856) -- _t8. Ergebnisse -- _tLiteraturverzeichnis |
| 506 | 0 |
_arestricted access _uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec _fonline access with authorization _2star |
|
| 520 | _aBehandelt werden in vergleichender Perspektive vier markante Texte zur Entwicklung eines staatswissenschaftlichen Forschungsprogramms. | ||
| 520 | _a[The Traditionally Perceived Concept of Political Science]Four prominent texts from the 18th and 19th centuries are discussed and compared in order to develop a political science research programme. Clear differences between the approaches are developed, but some convergences are also emphasised which were further developed during the discussion of the discipline of “political science”. Finally the question is raised to what extent the common core of the considerations can be beneficial for today’s political science. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also in print. | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
| 546 | _aIn German. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022) | |
| 650 | 0 | _aState, The. | |
| 650 | 4 | _aStaatswissenschaft. | |
| 650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Public. _2bisacsh |
|
| 850 | _aIT-RoAPU | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895483 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110895483 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 |
_3Cover _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783110895483/original |
| 942 | _cEB | ||
| 999 |
_c249529 _d249529 |
||