000 04171nam a2200601 454500
001 303375
003 IT-RoAPU
005 20250106151634.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 240625t20232023gw fo d z eng d
020 _a9783111055022
_qprint
020 _a9783111055626
_qEPUB
020 _a9783111055466
_qPDF
024 7 _a10.1515/9783111055466
_2doi
035 _a(DE-B1597)9783111055466
035 _a(DE-B1597)638100
035 _a(OCoLC)1414457627
040 _aDE-B1597
_beng
_cDE-B1597
_erda
082 0 4 _a459.5
_qOCoLC
_223/eng/20240229
084 _aonline - DeGruyter
100 1 _aIlioaia, Mihaela
_eautore
245 1 4 _aThe MIHI EST construction :
_bAn instance of non-canonical subject marking in Romanian /
_cMihaela Ilioaia.
264 1 _aBerlin ;
_aBoston :
_bDe Gruyter,
_c[2023]
264 4 _c©2023
300 _a1 online resource (XXII, 334 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 0 _aBeihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie ,
_x0084-5396 ;
_v481
502 _aDiss.
_cGhent University
_d2021.
505 0 0 _tFrontmatter --
_tAcknowledgements --
_tContents --
_tList of abbreviations --
_tList of tables --
_tList of figures --
_tChapter 1 Romanian between Romance and South-East European languages --
_tChapter 2 The object of the study --
_tPart 1: The mihi est construction --
_tChapter 3 The mihi est construction as a complex-predicate construction --
_tChapter 4 Corpus and methodology --
_tChapter 5 Nouns entering the mihi est construction --
_tPart 2: The subject and its properties --
_tChapter 6 The subject: Toward a universal definition --
_tChapter 7 Subject properties in Romanian --
_tChapter 8 Identifying the subject of the mihi est construction --
_tPart 3: Expansion of the non-canonical pattern --
_tChapter 9 Productivity of the mihi est construction --
_tChapter 10 Summary and conclusions --
_tBibliography --
_tAppendices --
_tAppendix 1 --
_tAppendix 2 --
_tIndex of subjects --
_tIndex of names
506 0 _arestricted access
_uhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
_fonline access with authorization
_2star
520 _aThis book examines the Romanian mihi est construction (Mi-e foame/frică, me.dat = is hunger/fear ‘I am hungry/ afraid’). While it disappeared from all other Romance languages to be replaced with a habeo structure, the mihi est pattern is in Romanian the most common way of expressing psychological or physiological states. By means of synchronic and diachronic corpus studies, the book investigates the status of the core arguments of the mihi est structure, i.e. the dative experiencer and the nominative state noun, as well as its evolution throughout the centuries. The data analysis reveals that the dative experiencer syntactically behaves like nominative subjects, whereas the state noun shows predicate behavior. As for the evolution of the mihi est structure, the analysis shows a certain tendency toward innovation, since in present-day Romanian it can coerce nouns coming from other semantic fields into the construction’s psychological or physiological interpretation. Could this be another unique trait of Romanian, which causes it to seemingly go against the tendency of most Romance languages toward canonical marking of core arguments?
530 _aIssued also in print.
538 _aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
546 _aIn English.
588 0 _aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 25. Jun 2024)
650 4 _aKorpus ‹Linguistik›.
650 4 _aRumänisch.
650 4 _aSubjekt ‹Linguistik›.
650 4 _aThematische Relation.
653 _aRomanian.
653 _acorpus study.
653 _adative subjects.
653 _aexperiencer.
850 _aIT-RoAPU
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783111055466
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783111055466
856 4 2 _3Cover
_uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9783111055466/original
942 _cEB
999 _c303375
_d303375