Library Catalog
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

In-Your-Face Politics : The Consequences of Uncivil Media / Diana C. Mutz.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, [2015]Copyright date: ©2016Edition: Course BookDescription: 1 online resource (288 p.) : 46 line illus. 2 tablesContent type:
Media type:
Carrier type:
ISBN:
  • 9780691165110
  • 9781400865871
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 324.730973 23
LOC classification:
  • P95.82.U6
Other classification:
  • online - DeGruyter
Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also in print.
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Illustrations -- Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1. What Is "In-Your- Face" Politics? -- Part I. What Difference Does It Make? The Effects of In-Your- Face Political Television -- Chapter 2. The Consequences of In-Your- Face Politics for Arousal and Memory -- Chapter 3. Effects on Public Perceptions of the Legitimacy of the Opposition -- Chapter 4. The Costs of In-Your- Face Politics for Political Trust -- Part II. When Does In-Your- Face Politics Matter? -- Chapter 5. Real-World Contexts -- Chapter 6. Who Watches This Stuff Anyway? The Audience for In-Your- Face Politics -- Part III. Historical Implications for Political Television -- Chapter 7. Does the Medium Matter? -- Chapter 8. How Politics on Television Has Changed -- Chapter 9. Making Politics Palatable: Political Television in an Era of Choice -- Appendix A. Summary of Experimental Designs -- Appendix B. Summary of Experimental Dependent Variables -- Appendix C. National Survey Questions for Orientation toward Conflict Communication Scales -- Appendix D. Coding Form for Political Television Programs -- Appendix E. Coding Instructions for Televised Conflicts -- Notes -- References -- Index
Summary: Americans are disgusted with watching politicians screaming and yelling at one another on television. But does all the noise really make a difference? Drawing on numerous studies, Diana Mutz provides the first comprehensive look at the consequences of in-your-face politics. Her book contradicts the conventional wisdom by documenting both the benefits and the drawbacks of in-your-face media."In-your-face" politics refers to both the level of incivility and the up-close and personal way that we experience political conflict on television. Just as actual physical closeness intensifies people's emotional reactions to others, the appearance of closeness on a video screen has similar effects. We tend to keep our distance from those with whom we disagree. Modern media, however, puts those we dislike in our faces in a way that intensifies our negative reactions. Mutz finds that incivility is particularly detrimental to facilitating respect for oppositional political viewpoints and to citizens' levels of trust in politicians and the political process. On the positive side, incivility and close-up camera perspectives contribute to making politics more physiologically arousing and entertaining to viewers. This encourages more attention to political programs, stimulates recall of the content, and encourages people to relay content to others.In the end, In-Your-Face Politics demonstrates why political incivility is not easily dismissed as a disservice to democracy-it may even be a necessity in an age with so much competition for citizens' attention.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number URL Status Notes Barcode
eBook eBook Biblioteca "Angelicum" Pont. Univ. S.Tommaso d'Aquino Nuvola online online - DeGruyter (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Online access Not for loan (Accesso limitato) Accesso per gli utenti autorizzati / Access for authorized users (dgr)9781400865871

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Illustrations -- Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1. What Is "In-Your- Face" Politics? -- Part I. What Difference Does It Make? The Effects of In-Your- Face Political Television -- Chapter 2. The Consequences of In-Your- Face Politics for Arousal and Memory -- Chapter 3. Effects on Public Perceptions of the Legitimacy of the Opposition -- Chapter 4. The Costs of In-Your- Face Politics for Political Trust -- Part II. When Does In-Your- Face Politics Matter? -- Chapter 5. Real-World Contexts -- Chapter 6. Who Watches This Stuff Anyway? The Audience for In-Your- Face Politics -- Part III. Historical Implications for Political Television -- Chapter 7. Does the Medium Matter? -- Chapter 8. How Politics on Television Has Changed -- Chapter 9. Making Politics Palatable: Political Television in an Era of Choice -- Appendix A. Summary of Experimental Designs -- Appendix B. Summary of Experimental Dependent Variables -- Appendix C. National Survey Questions for Orientation toward Conflict Communication Scales -- Appendix D. Coding Form for Political Television Programs -- Appendix E. Coding Instructions for Televised Conflicts -- Notes -- References -- Index

restricted access online access with authorization star

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Americans are disgusted with watching politicians screaming and yelling at one another on television. But does all the noise really make a difference? Drawing on numerous studies, Diana Mutz provides the first comprehensive look at the consequences of in-your-face politics. Her book contradicts the conventional wisdom by documenting both the benefits and the drawbacks of in-your-face media."In-your-face" politics refers to both the level of incivility and the up-close and personal way that we experience political conflict on television. Just as actual physical closeness intensifies people's emotional reactions to others, the appearance of closeness on a video screen has similar effects. We tend to keep our distance from those with whom we disagree. Modern media, however, puts those we dislike in our faces in a way that intensifies our negative reactions. Mutz finds that incivility is particularly detrimental to facilitating respect for oppositional political viewpoints and to citizens' levels of trust in politicians and the political process. On the positive side, incivility and close-up camera perspectives contribute to making politics more physiologically arousing and entertaining to viewers. This encourages more attention to political programs, stimulates recall of the content, and encourages people to relay content to others.In the end, In-Your-Face Politics demonstrates why political incivility is not easily dismissed as a disservice to democracy-it may even be a necessity in an age with so much competition for citizens' attention.

Issued also in print.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Aug 2021)